Visual Marker Positioning for More Accurate Mobile Geolocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for determining the location of mobile electronic devices using visual markers, such as QR codes, lack accuracy and often rely solely on locally-determined GPS data, which can be imprecise.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing computer vision techniques like VIO and SLAM to determine relative positioning between a mobile device and a visual marker, combined with crowd-sourced location data from multiple devices, to enhance the accuracy of geolocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standalone GPS or local sensors are used to determine device location, then the system is simple and easy to operate, but the location accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple positioning methods (GPS, visual markers with VIO/SLAM/PNP techniques, and local sensors) into a unified location determination system. The system merges data from different sources to achieve higher accuracy while managing complexity through integrated processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Visual markers serve as intermediary elements that bridge the device's local sensing system with external reference frames. The markers provide known position information that enables the system to anchor and refine location calculations, improving accuracy without requiring the device to directly measure absolute positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If visual markers with computer vision techniques are used to determine location, then location accuracy is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeolocation accuracyVSAvoidcomputer vision processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the location determination task into distinct modules: visual marker detection, relative positioning calculation (using VIO/SLAM/PNP), and location refinement. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture by dividing complex processing into manageable stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing visual markers with known locations in the environment. This preparation enables the device to use these pre-positioned references for accurate location determination without requiring complex real-time measurements, reducing the computational burden during actual location queries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple positioning methods are combined for higher accuracy, then location precision improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively using different positioning methods based on availability and requirements. The system uses visual markers and computer vision techniques when markers are detected, while falling back to GPS or sensor-based methods when markers are not visible, thus avoiding unnecessary processing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where location data from visual markers is used to refine and correct GPS or sensor-based position estimates. This feedback loop allows the system to iteratively improve accuracy while reducing processing time by using corrections from high-accuracy sources to adjust less accurate measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12626395B2Location aware visual markers
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 APPLE INC
  • US12626395B2 patent drawing
  • US12626395B2 patent drawing
  • US12626395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various implementations disclosed herein include devices, systems, and methods that determine the relative positioning (e.g., offset) between a mobile electronic device and a visual marker. In some implementations, the determined relative positioning and a known position of the visual marker are used to determine a position (e.g., geo coordinates) of the mobile electronic device that is more accurate than existing techniques. In some implementations, the determined relative positioning is used with a position of the mobile electronic device to crowd source the stored position of the visual marker. In some implementations, the determined relative positioning and a position of the visual marker are used to determine a position of an object detected in an image by the mobile electronic device. In some implementations at an electronic device having a processor, locally-determined locations of a visual marker are received from mobile electronic devices that scan a visual marker.