Visual OOD Detection Using General Features and Hierarchical Prompts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing OOD detection methods, particularly those relying on single-modal learning and multi-modal approaches like CLIP, struggle to effectively distinguish between in-distribution and out-of-distribution data due to limitations in capturing semantic distinctions and generalizable features, leading to misclassifications in real-world applications.

Innovation Solution

A multi-modal OOD detection system utilizing a general feature representation and informative textual content with hierarchical structure, employing a general feature index to mask class-specific features and incorporate superclass prompts, calculates an OOD score through similarity analysis of masked image features and text embeddings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If single-modal learning approaches are used that depend only on visual data for OOD detection, then the system is simpler to implement, but it cannot effectively capture semantic distinctions when OOD inputs visually resemble ID data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidOOD detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines visual data and textual data into a unified multi-modal framework. The image encoder processes visual inputs while the text encoder processes hierarchical text prompts, and their features are fused through attention mechanisms to jointly determine OOD detection, thereby capturing both visual and semantic information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces hierarchical text prompts as an intermediary element that bridges visual data and semantic meaning. These text prompts serve as mediators that guide the attention mechanism to focus on relevant semantic aspects, enabling the system to distinguish OOD inputs that visually resemble ID data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional single-modality methods use robust feature and specific distance metrics to discern OOD data from ID data, then the detection process is straightforward, but it overlooks semantic information embedded in textual descriptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection process simplicityVSAvoidsemantic information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the feature extraction process into distinct visual and textual pathways. The image encoder extracts visual features while the text encoder extracts semantic features from hierarchical prompts, allowing both types of information to be processed independently before being integrated through attention mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a textual dimension to the traditionally visual-only OOD detection process. By incorporating text embeddings from hierarchical prompts as an additional feature dimension, the system captures semantic information that complements visual features, enabling more comprehensive OOD detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If multi-modal approaches like CLIP are used to capture both visual and textual information, then semantic distinctions can be captured, but the system fails to effectively distinguish between in-distribution and out-of-distribution data due to limitations in capturing generalizable features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic distinction capabilityVSAvoidOOD detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates class-specific features from the multi-modal representations. By identifying and removing features that are specific to particular classes, the system retains only the generalizable features that are relevant for OOD detection, thereby improving reliability without sacrificing semantic distinction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the attention weights and feature aggregation parameters based on the input characteristics. By changing these parameters adaptively, the system optimizes the balance between capturing semantic distinctions and identifying generalizable patterns for reliable OOD detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260017922A1System and method for out-of-distribution detection of visual content using general representation and informative content
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20260017922A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017922A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017922A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes encoding a set of hierarchical text prompts to define a set of text embeddings, where the set of hierarchical text prompt defines a primary informative prompt and a secondary informative prompt associated with the primary informative prompt. The method further includes encoding an input image to define a plurality of feature representations, changing a value of one or more identified feature representations among the plurality of feature representations to mask the one or more identified feature representation and define a general feature representation of the input image based on a class-specific threshold indicative of boundary between a class-specific feature and a general feature. The method further includes classifying the input image based on an out-of-distribution (OOD) score determined using a similarity analysis of the general feature representation and the set of text embeddings.