Visual Prosthesis Spatial Fitting by Percept Location Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current visual prosthesis fitting methods, both manual and automated, face challenges in achieving long-term stability of projected locations of percepts (PLPs), leading to frequent recalibrations and inaccuracies in hand-camera coordination, especially without consistent corrective feedback.

Innovation Solution

An improved spatial fitting and training system that maps projected locations of percepts over time, allowing for continuous correction and recalibration to maintain accurate alignment of visual stimuli with the electrode array, using a combination of physical and electronic adjustments based on real-time data analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual or automated fitting methods are used for visual prosthesis, then initial spatial alignment can be achieved, but long-term stability of projected locations of percepts deteriorates over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial alignment accuracyVSAvoidstability of projected locations of percepts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback by tracking the actual projected locations of percepts over time and comparing them with intended locations. This feedback loop enables automatic recalibration to maintain spatial alignment accuracy without requiring frequent manual interventions, thereby resolving the contradiction between initial precision and long-term stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The fitting system transitions from static initial calibration to dynamic continuous adaptation. By monitoring PLP variations over time and automatically adjusting the mapping parameters, the system maintains optimal spatial alignment despite changes in the visual prosthesis performance or patient conditions, thus achieving both precision and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If frequent recalibrations are performed to maintain spatial alignment, then pointing accuracy can be maintained, but time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepointing accuracyVSAvoidtime for recalibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically detecting deviations in projected percept locations and correcting the mapping parameters without external intervention. This self-service capability maintains pointing accuracy continuously while eliminating the time loss associated with manual recalibration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of periodic discrete recalibrations, the system implements continuous automatic adjustment of spatial mapping parameters. This continuous useful action ensures pointing accuracy is maintained at all times without the interruptions and time losses associated with frequent manual recalibration sessions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If corrective feedback is provided consistently during fitting, then spatial mapping accuracy improves, but device complexity and operational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial mapping accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of feedback system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical or manual feedback mechanisms with automated computational algorithms. The spatial mapping accuracy is improved through software-based tracking and correction of projected percept locations, eliminating the need for complex physical adjustment mechanisms or extensive manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10052482B2Spatial fitting by percept location tracking
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 CORTIGENT INC
  • US10052482B2 patent drawing
  • US10052482B2 patent drawing
  • US10052482B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is an improved spatial fitting and training system for a visual prosthesis. The system of the present invention maps projected locations of percepts, where a person perceives a percept from a visual prosthesis to the intended location of the percepts. The projected location may vary over time. These test results can be used to correct a visual prosthesis or spatially map the visual prosthesis.