Visual Prosthesis Shape Analysis for Spatial Fitting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing visual prostheses with multiple electrodes face challenges in adjusting each electrode for optimal size, brightness, and shape of percepts without requiring extensive patient interaction, as individual responses to neural stimulation vary significantly across the retina, making manual adjustment impractical for complex electrode arrays.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an array of electrodes in a visual prosthesis that selects and displays geometric shapes to the subject, allowing them to describe perceived shapes, which are then compared to a set of reference shapes using optical character recognition and sequence tracking detection accuracy to adjust the electrode stimulation for improved spatial fitting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustment of each electrode is performed to optimize perception quality, then the precision of spatial fitting is improved, but the time required for fitting increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial fitting precisionVSAvoidfitting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic electrode adjustment using algorithms that analyze patient responses to presented shapes and autonomously optimize stimulation parameters, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual adjustment by clinicians while maintaining high spatial fitting precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system systematically varies stimulation parameters such as amplitude, pulse width, and electrode activation patterns to automatically determine optimal settings for each electrode based on patient perceptual responses, replacing manual parameter tuning with automated parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the number of electrodes in the visual prosthesis array is increased to improve resolution, then the image quality is improved, but the complexity of individual electrode characterization increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual resolutionVSAvoidelectrode characterization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex task of characterizing multiple electrodes into smaller sub-tasks by presenting specific geometric shapes that activate subsets of electrodes, allowing systematic analysis of individual electrode contributions while managing the overall complexity of the multi-electrode array

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an automated characterization algorithm as an intermediary between the clinician and the multiple electrodes, which systematically analyzes patient responses to shape presentations and automatically determines optimal parameters for each electrode, reducing the burden of characterizing large numbers of electrodes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If extensive patient interaction is required for electrode adjustment, then the accuracy of individual electrode optimization is improved, but the ease of operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode optimization accuracyVSAvoidfitting process ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where patient responses to presented shapes are systematically recorded and analyzed to automatically adjust stimulation parameters, maintaining high optimization accuracy while reducing the operational burden compared to manual iterative adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of electrode parameters by automatically analyzing patient perceptual responses and autonomously optimizing stimulation settings, eliminating the need for complex manual operations while preserving optimization accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables automatic adjustment of the visual prosthesis to provide accurate and consistent perception of complex shapes without lengthy patient interaction, improving spatial fitting and reducing the complexity of characterizing each electrode individually.

Implementation Method 1

Neural tissue can be artificially stimulated and activated by prosthetic devices that pass pulses of electrical current through electrodes on the prosthetic devices. The passage of current causes changes in electrical potentials across visual neuronal membranes, which can initiate visual neuron action potentials.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Data Source

PatentUS9694180B2Shape analysis for fitting in a visual prosthesis
Publication Date: 2017.07.04 CORTIGENT INC
  • US9694180B2 patent drawing
  • US9694180B2 patent drawing
  • US9694180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of testing subjects' perception of complex shapes created by patterned multi-electrode direct stimulation of a retinal prosthesis is described. The complex shapes can be geometric shapes or characters such as letters of the alphabet and numbers.