Visual Sensor Return Transaction Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing return transaction processes in retail environments are inefficient and prone to errors, requiring significant staff time and resources, and lacking in accuracy, which can lead to customer dissatisfaction and inefficient inventory management.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing visual sensors networked to a controller to monitor and analyze interactions within the environment, enabling real-time identification of customers and items, predicting return intentions, and facilitating streamlined return transactions by reducing the need for staffed customer service areas through touchless checkout and data-driven inventory management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional staffed customer service areas are used for return transactions, then accuracy of return processing is improved, but time required for each transaction increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of return processingVSAvoidtransaction throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service return transactions through visual sensor-based automatic customer identification, item recognition, and eligibility determination. Customers place items in designated return zones and the system automatically processes the return without requiring staff intervention, thereby increasing transaction throughput while maintaining accuracy through automated verification against purchase records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes (staff reviewing receipts, verifying items, processing refunds) with an automated visual sensor system that captures images, identifies customers and items through image analysis, checks eligibility criteria, and processes returns electronically. This substitution eliminates human error and speeds up transaction processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual return transaction processing is used, then flexibility in handling various return scenarios is improved, but time consumption and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling return scenariosVSAvoidtime consumption per transaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses visual sensors to capture and analyze multiple parameters including customer appearance features, item characteristics, packaging conditions, and zone location data. These parameters are processed to automatically determine return eligibility, transforming various return scenarios into quantifiable data points that can be rapidly evaluated against predefined criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where visual sensor data is continuously analyzed, compared against purchase records and return policies, and used to automatically approve or reject returns. The system provides real-time feedback to customers through notifications and can adjust processing based on item condition assessments, enabling flexible handling of various return scenarios without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If visual sensor-based automatic return processing is implemented, then transaction speed and productivity are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The visual sensor system performs multiple functions including customer identification, item recognition, condition assessment, eligibility verification, and transaction processing within a single integrated platform. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems for each task, managing complexity while enhancing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary automated processing layer between the customer and the final return decision. Visual sensors and image analysis algorithms serve as intermediaries that translate physical items and customer actions into digital data, which is then processed against return policies, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining high transaction throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If staffed return areas are used, then ability to handle complex return situations is improved, but operational costs and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle complex returnsVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-registering customers and their purchase histories in the database before returns occur. Visual sensors capture customer biometric data at entry and pre-validate their identity and purchase records, so that when returns are processed, the system can quickly verify eligibility without requiring staff to manually review complex scenarios. This preliminary preparation enables reliable handling of complex returns with minimal resource expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11257095B2Visual sensor-based management of a return transaction
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 TOSHIBA GLOBAL COMMERCE SOLUTIONS HLDG
  • US11257095B2 patent drawing
  • US11257095B2 patent drawing
  • US11257095B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, computer program product, and system are disclosed for managing a return transaction within an environment having a plurality of purchasable item. The method acquires, using at least one visual sensor disposed within the environment, first image information including a first person and including a first item associated with the first person. The method identifies the first person using image analysis performed on the first image information. Further, the method determines, using image analysis performed on the first image information and based on one or more predetermined criteria, that the first item is eligible to be returned by the first person within the return transaction. Upon completion of one or more predefined return tasks specified for the first item within the return transaction, the method updates a first data structure representing an inventory of the environment to reflect the returned first item.