Visual Stimulus Assessment System for Neural Disease Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing neurological and mental disorders, such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, autism, and schizophrenia, lack effective tools for early detection and monitoring of visual and cognitive impairments, relying on costly and burdensome brain imaging and qualitative behavioral assessments that do not quantify visual deficits effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for quantitative assessment of functional impairment using a combination of input, display, and control devices, presenting dynamic scenes to subjects and analyzing their responses to diagnose and recommend interventions, incorporating artificial intelligence for real-time scoring and diagnosis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If brain imaging and qualitative behavioral assessments are used for diagnosis, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but cost and operational burden increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidoperational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical and procedural diagnostic systems (brain imaging equipment, multiple behavioral assessments) with a computerized visual processing system that uses software algorithms to analyze visual stimuli responses, thereby maintaining diagnostic accuracy while reducing operational burden and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified computational model that copies and analyzes visual processing patterns, using virtual simulations of visual scenarios to assess cognitive and visual functions without requiring physical brain imaging procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If quantitative assessment methods are implemented, then measurement precision of visual deficits is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantification of visual deficitsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of visual stimuli (contrast, luminance, spatial frequency, temporal frequency) and systematically varies them to quantify visual processing thresholds and sensitivities, enabling precise measurement of visual deficits through controlled parameter modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system adjusts stimulus parameters based on subject responses, using adaptive algorithms to converge on threshold values that precisely quantify visual processing capabilities while maintaining an manageable system through automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If early detection capabilities are enhanced through sensitive testing, then diagnostic timing is improved, but test complexity and subject burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to diagnosisVSAvoidsubject burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing testing on specific visual processing domains most relevant to early detection of neurological conditions, rather than进行全面 comprehensive testing, thereby achieving early diagnosis with reduced subject burden and test complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9028257B2Method and system for quantitative assessment of word recognition sensitivity
Publication Date: 2015.05.12 COGNIVUE INC
  • US9028257B2 patent drawing
  • US9028257B2 patent drawing
  • US9028257B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system are presented to address quantitative assessment of word recognition sensitivity of a subject, where the method comprises the steps of: (1) presenting at least one scene, comprising a plurality of letters and a background, to a subject on a display; (2) moving the plurality of letters relative to the scene; (3) receiving feedback from the subject via at least one; (4) quantitatively refining the received feedback; (5) modulating the saliency of the plurality of letters relative to accuracy of the quantitatively refined feedback; (6) calculating a critical threshold parameter; and (7) recording a critical threshold parameter onto a tangible computer readable medium.