Visual Tag Pattern Detection via Taxonomy Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems fail to effectively identify emerging visual media viewing patterns, which are crucial for tailoring content and advertising to users, as they rely on analyzing all visual tags individually rather than filtering specific tags and their combinations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a taxonomy-based filter to select specific visual tags and generate pattern candidates from these tags, evaluating consumption metrics to rank emerging viewing patterns, allowing for more accurate identification of trends.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all visual tags are analyzed individually, then comprehensive coverage of visual media is achieved, but the system complexity and computational burden increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual pattern identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the visual tag analysis process into distinct stages: initial tag generation, taxonomy-based filtering, pattern candidate generation, and metric evaluation. This segmentation allows the system to process visual tags in manageable stages rather than analyzing all tags simultaneously, reducing system complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes irrelevant visual tags from the complete set using taxonomy-based filtering. By taking out only the necessary tags and their combinations for pattern analysis, the system reduces computational burden and complexity while focusing on the most relevant visual patterns for emerging trend identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If all visual tags and their combinations are evaluated, then complete pattern detection is achieved, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern detection completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary filtering of visual tags using taxonomy-based criteria before generating pattern candidates. This preliminary action eliminates irrelevant tags early in the process, so that subsequent pattern evaluation focuses only on promising candidates, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining detection completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent evaluates a selective subset of pattern candidates rather than all possible tag combinations. By applying partial action to the most relevant patterns identified through filtering and ranking, the system achieves effective pattern detection without the excessive computational cost of exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If taxonomy-based filtering is applied to select specific visual tags, then processing efficiency improves, but the risk of missing emerging patterns increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidpattern identification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where consumption metrics are evaluated for filtered visual tags and pattern candidates. This feedback loop allows the system to verify whether filtering has eliminated important patterns, and to adjust the filtering criteria accordingly, thereby maintaining reliability while preserving processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies taxonomy-based filtering with multiple functions: it organizes visual tags hierarchically, filters relevant tags for efficiency, and simultaneously generates pattern candidates from the filtered set. This multi-functional approach ensures that filtering serves multiple purposes without compromising pattern identification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12073620B2Visual tag emerging pattern detection
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 SNAP INC
  • US12073620B2 patent drawing
  • US12073620B2 patent drawing
  • US12073620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices, media, and methods are presented for identifying emerging viewing patterns for visual media such as still images and videos. Emerging viewing patterns are identified by identifying visual tags for visual media viewed by users, selecting a subset of the tags by applying a taxonomy-based filter, generating pattern candidates from the subset, evaluating consumption metrics for each of the generated patterns, and ranking the generated pattern candidates responsive to the consumption metrics to identify emerging viewing patterns for the users.