Vital Speed Profile for Train Safety Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current train safety systems rely on human operators, leading to potential mistakes that can result in unsafe conditions and accidents, particularly in exceeding speed limits and violating authorized movement areas, with existing automated systems either being too reactive or requiring significant computing power.

Innovation Solution

A vital onboard train control system is developed, which generates a speed profile for the entire trip, utilizing multiple wayside computers to verify and enforce speed limits through redundant sensors and GPS, with corrective actions including warnings and emergency brake activation to prevent speed violations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a reactive penalty brake system is used to prevent speed violations, then the system structure is simple, but the system reliability is reduced because preventive action occurs only after the authorized movement limit has been violated

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates and enforces speed limits in advance based on the train's current position and the authorized movement area, rather than reacting after a violation occurs. This preliminary calculation of safe speed limits ensures preventive action is taken before the train exceeds authorized boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors train position and speed, compares actual values against calculated safe limits, and provides real-time feedback to the operator through warnings and alerts. This closed-loop feedback mechanism maintains safety while enabling proactive prevention of violations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a sophisticated predictive system is used to anticipate speed violations, then the system reliability is improved through proactive prevention, but the device complexity increases due to significant onboard computing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcomputing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential calculation needed for speed limit enforcement - determining the safe speed based on current position and authorized area - rather than implementing comprehensive predictive analytics. This extraction of the critical function reduces onboard computing requirements while maintaining safety effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary approach by calculating safe speed limits based on position and authorized area parameters, serving as a mediator between the train's movement and safety constraints. This intermediary calculation method avoids the need for complex predictive modeling while still providing proactive safety enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If human operators control train movement, then the system complexity is low, but the reliability decreases due to potential operator errors in complying with speed restrictions and authorized movement limits

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomplianceVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous feedback to the operator about the train's position relative to the authorized area and the current safe speed limit. This feedback loop maintains operator involvement while providing the computational rigor needed for reliable compliance, combining human decision-making with automated safety calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the train control system to automatically calculate and enforce safe speed limits based on position and authorized area, without requiring the operator to perform complex calculations or judgments. This self-service approach to safety enforcement improves compliance reliability while keeping the interface simple for the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9168935B2Vital speed profile to control a train moving along a track
Publication Date: 2015.10.27 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC
  • US9168935B2 patent drawing
  • US9168935B2 patent drawing
  • US9168935B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A speed profile for an entire train trip includes a maximum allowable speed at each point of the entire trip, taking into account the ability of the train to comply with speed reductions encountered during the trip. The speed profile includes a braking curve that gradually reduces from a higher speed to a lower speed starting at a point at which the train must begin braking in order to be traveling at the lower speed when the train reaches the point at which the lower speed limit begins. The speed profile is generated on multiple wayside computers, cross checked, and then vitally transmitted to an onboard locomotive control system. The onboard control system includes redundant speed sensors with redundant vital circuits, and also includes redundant speed comparators to ensure that the train doesn't exceed the speed profile. A GPS receiver may be used for greater reliability.