Real-Time Video Censoring via VLC Entity Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video capture and sharing technologies fail to effectively censor protected content in real-time, requiring labor-intensive post-processing and resource-heavy techniques to obscure sensitive or copyright-protected information from unauthorized viewers.

Innovation Solution

Employing Visual Light Communication (VLC) technology to transmit entity information about protected content, which is used to identify and modify video recordings in real-time, replacing sensitive information with graphical elements to obscure it from view, ensuring privacy and confidentiality during live video streaming.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If post-processing techniques are used to blur-out protected content, then privacy and confidentiality are maintained, but processing resources and time-delays increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by detecting protected content during video capture and applying censorship in real-time before the video is fully recorded or transmitted. This prevents the need for later post-processing, thereby maintaining privacy while avoiding the resource-intensive and time-consuming nature of post-processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual post-processing operations with automated real-time detection and censorship systems. Entity recognition algorithms and content analysis performed during video capture substitute for labor-intensive manual editing, significantly improving processing efficiency while maintaining reliable privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of time

If real-time censorship is implemented, then processing time is reduced, but device complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecensorship processing timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the censorship function into distinct modular components: entity recognition module, content analysis module, censorship decision module, and video processing module. This segmentation allows real-time processing by dividing the complex task into manageable stages that can be executed efficiently and independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary elements such as entity recognition algorithms and content analysis filters that act as mediators between video capture and final censorship. These intermediaries enable automated real-time detection and decision-making, reducing the need for complex manual intervention while maintaining effective censorship.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual post-processing is used to censor video content, then censorship accuracy is maintained, but labor input and processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecensorship accuracyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the video system to automatically detect protected content, make censorship decisions, and apply censorship filters without human intervention. The entity recognition algorithms and content analysis systems perform the censorship function autonomously, maintaining accuracy while eliminating labor-intensive manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where entity recognition results and content analysis outcomes feed into automated censorship decision systems. This feedback loop enables the system to continuously adjust and refine censorship accuracy based on detected content characteristics, maintaining high precision while operating automatically without manual input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9986290B2Video censoring
Publication Date: 2018.05.29 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9986290B2 patent drawing
  • US9986290B2 patent drawing
  • US9986290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Censoring a video recording of an environment, the environment containing a protected entity displaying protected content to be censored. Video of the environment is processed in accordance with an entity recognition process to identify the presence of at least part of an entity in the environment. It is determined if the identified entity is to be censored based on based on entity information of a received VLC signal. Based on the identified entity being determined to be censored, the video recording is modified to replace at least a portion of the identified entity with a graphical element adapted to obscure the portion of the identified entity in the video stream. By modifying a video stream to obscure an entity, protected content in the environment may be prevented from being displayed to a viewer of the video recording.