Vision-Language Prompt Tuning for Human-Confirmable Image Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer-assisted visual diagnosis methods, particularly using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), require extensive labeled datasets, significant computational resources, and domain-specific expertise, limiting scalability and reproducibility, and fine-tuning general vision-language models (VLMs) is costly and inconsistent.

Innovation Solution

A human-in-the-loop active prompt tuning approach that leverages structured and unstructured information to refine vision-language models for domain-specific diagnostic tasks, using a frozen VLM with a System Prompt and iterative human review to generate a Prompt Set for consistent and accurate image classification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If supervised deep learning models (CNNs) are used for computer-assisted visual diagnosis, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but the need for extensive labeled datasets and significant computational resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidlabeled datasets and computational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses few-shot prompting with a small number of hand-crafted examples (5-10 images per class) instead of extensive labeled datasets. These examples are disposable in the sense that they are manually created once and then reused repeatedly for inference without requiring retraining, replacing the need for large-scale annotated data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and separates the domain-specific knowledge into hand-crafted prompt examples that are independent of the base VLM model. This extraction allows the system to use a frozen pre-trained VLM without requiring extraction of features through extensive training on domain-specific data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If VLMs are fine-tuned for domain-specific tasks, then task performance is improved, but training cost and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask performanceVSAvoidtraining cost and time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by hand-crafting prompt examples and system prompts before inference. These prompts are created in advance based on domain expertise and then reused for all inference tasks, eliminating the need for time-consuming fine-tuning processes for each new task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by replicating hand-crafted prompt examples across different inference scenarios. Instead of training a new model for each task, the same prompt structure and examples are copied and adapted slightly for different domain-specific tasks, maintaining performance while avoiding retraining costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If few-shot prompting is used with general VLMs, then the need for extensive training is reduced, but output consistency and reliability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneed for trainingVSAvoidoutput consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces hand-crafted system prompts and structured prompt examples as intermediaries between the general VLM and the specific diagnostic task. These intermediary prompts guide the model's reasoning process and ensure consistent output formats, bridging the gap between general-purpose VLMs and domain-specific requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by structuring the prompt input with specific formats, temperature settings, and guidance parameters. This parameter control ensures that the VLM produces consistent, reliable outputs suitable for medical diagnostics without requiring task-specific fine-tuning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If expert review and annotation of images is performed, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but expert time and scalability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidexpert time and scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables self-service by allowing the VLM to perform diagnostic analysis autonomously using hand-crafted prompts. The system serves itself by generating diagnostic reports without requiring continuous expert intervention, while experts only need to review and validate results, significantly improving scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250371863A1Active prompt tuning of vision-language models for human-confirmable diagnostics from images
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 UNIV OF SOUTH FLORIDA
  • US20250371863A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371863A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371863A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided herein for developing and deploying active-prompt-tuned, domain-specific image diagnosis and categorization applications. Processes of the present disclosure may control and provide for human-confirmable diagnostics from images, based on controlled instructions provided to vision-language models. The controlled instructions may be developed by systems provided herein, which generate system prompts and example prompt sets using active prompt tuning approaches.