VLP Mode Power Control for 6 GHz Interference Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The Very Low Power (VLP) mode in the 6 GHz band faces challenges in power control to minimize interference with licensed operators, requiring precise power management to ensure successful communication while adhering to regulatory limits.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a power control mechanism where communication devices in the VLP mode set and adjust transmission power based on Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS), bandwidth, and Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI), with a margin to account for measurement errors, to ensure reliable communication without exceeding interference thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transmission power is increased to ensure successful packet reception, then reliability of communication is improved, but interference to licensed operators increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuccessful packet receptionVSAvoidinterference to licensed operators
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts transmission power parameters based on channel conditions, distance, and packet requirements. By changing power levels adaptively rather than using fixed high power, the system achieves reliable communication when needed while minimizing interference during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system transmits at minimum necessary power levels rather than maximum power, using excessive power only when absolutely required for successful reception. This partial action approach ensures reliability is achieved only to the extent necessary, avoiding unnecessary interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Object-generated harmful factors

If transmission power is reduced to minimize interference, then harmful effects on licensed operators are reduced, but reliability of communication deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference to licensed operatorsVSAvoidsuccessful packet reception
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where receiving devices report signal quality and channel conditions back to transmitting devices. This feedback enables dynamic power adjustment, allowing the system to maintain reliability by increasing power only when channel conditions warrant it, while minimizing interference when conditions are favorable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static power levels to dynamic power control, continuously adapting transmission power based on real-time channel conditions, distance variations, and packet priority. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by making power levels flexible rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If power control mechanisms are simplified for ease of operation, then ease of operation is improved, but precision of power management deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control implementationVSAvoidpower management precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The power control system operates autonomously using pre-defined algorithms and protocols. Devices automatically calculate appropriate power levels based on embedded formulas considering distance, channel conditions, and packet requirements, eliminating the need for manual power configuration while maintaining precise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates pre-calculated power tables and lookup structures that provide guidance for power selection. By preparing power management data in advance based on typical scenarios, the system achieves both ease of operation through simplified selection processes and precision through pre-optimized power levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20220174612A1Power control for communication under very low power mode
Publication Date: 2022.06.02 INTEL CORP
  • US20220174612A1 patent drawing
  • US20220174612A1 patent drawing
  • US20220174612A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides techniques for power control for communications under a Very Low Power (VLP) mode. A communication device includes: processing circuitry, to encode a message to be transmitted to a second communication device, to indicate a setpoint, wherein the setpoint is defined as a minimum power at which a packet is required to be transmitted under a set of packet parameters, such that the packet could be successfully received by the communication device; and a transceiver, to transmit the message to the second communication device, and receive the packet transmitted at a power determined based on the setpoint and a margin, from the second communication device, wherein the margin is determined based on a probability of measurement errors.