VM Bandwidth Guarantee via Priority Queuing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cloud providers cannot accurately offer bandwidth guarantees between virtual machines (VMs), leading to unpredictable performance for tenants and inefficiencies in utilizing spare bandwidth, resulting in wasted capacity and hindered adoption of enterprise applications in cloud environments.

Innovation Solution

Implementing work conserving bandwidth guarantees using priority queues in hardware switches, where traffic within bandwidth guarantees is assigned to higher priority queues and excess traffic is directed to lower priority queues, allowing opportunistic use of spare bandwidth by other VM pairs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bandwidth guarantees are provided to VMs, then performance predictability is improved, but spare bandwidth utilization deteriorates due to conservative provisioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance predictabilityVSAvoidspare bandwidth utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts bandwidth allocation by monitoring actual traffic flows and reassigning unused guaranteed bandwidth to other VM pairs that need it. This transforms static bandwidth guarantees into dynamic allocations, maintaining performance predictability while improving overall utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

When VM pairs finish using their guaranteed bandwidth early, the system recovers the unused bandwidth capacity and makes it available for other VM pairs. This prevents bandwidth waste by continuously reallocating freed capacity to active traffic flows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple queues are used for bandwidth management, then service levels are differentiated, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice level differentiationVSAvoidqueue management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments traffic into different queues based on service level requirements and bandwidth guarantee status. High-priority queues handle traffic that must meet guaranteed bandwidth, while low-priority queues handle excess traffic that can utilize spare capacity. This segmentation enables service level differentiation without requiring complex custom management logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (the flow manager and priority queuing system) that automatically manages bandwidth allocation between different service levels. This intermediary handles the complexity of monitoring, comparing, and reallocating bandwidth, freeing tenants from managing their own queue configurations while still providing differentiated service levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If bandwidth guarantees are enforced, then tenant performance is protected, but overall network productivity decreases due to wasted capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetenant performance protectionVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous monitoring of bandwidth usage across all VM pairs and continuously reallocates unused guaranteed bandwidth to active flows. This ensures that tenant performance protection is maintained while maximizing network productivity through ongoing optimization of bandwidth utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The flow manager implements feedback loops by continuously monitoring actual traffic flows, comparing them against guaranteed bandwidth, and adjusting allocations accordingly. When VM pairs use less than their guaranteed bandwidth, the system detects this through feedback and reallocates the spare capacity to other VM pairs, thereby improving overall network productivity while maintaining tenant performance guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10110460B2Priority assessment of network traffic to conserve bandwidth guarantees in a data center
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US10110460B2 patent drawing
  • US10110460B2 patent drawing
  • US10110460B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example embodiments relate to work conserving bandwidth guarantees using priority, and a method for determining VM-to-VM bandwidth guarantees between a source virtual machine (VM) and at least one destination VM, including a particular VM-toVM bandwidth guarantee between the source VM and a particular destination VM. The method includes monitoring outbound network traffic flow from the source VM to the particular destination VM. The method includes comparing the outbound network traffic flow to the particular VM-to-VM bandwidth guarantee. When the outbound network traffic flow is less than the particular VM-to-VM bandwidth guarantee, packets of the flow are directed according to a first priority. When the outbound network traffic flow is greater than the particular VM-to-VM bandwidth guarantee, packets of the flow are directed according to a second priority.