VMAT Planning System Sub-Arc Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning algorithms often fail to find optimal treatment parameters due to dosimetric correlations between opposing or adjacent radiation beam directions, leading to noisy and suboptimal solutions.

Innovation Solution

The planning system subdivides the treatment arc into sub-arcs groups, distributing them evenly and minimizing beam direction similarity between groups, allowing for sequential determination of treatment parameters that reduce dosimetric correlations and improve plan quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the optimization algorithm is used to generate treatment parameters for the entire arc, then the treatment plan can be generated, but dosimetric correlations between opposing or adjacent beam directions cause the algorithm to stop prematurely and produce noisy solutions with strong oscillations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment parameter precisionVSAvoidoptimization convergence reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The arc is divided into multiple sub-arcs, and the optimization algorithm is applied sequentially to each sub-arc rather than to the entire arc at once. This segmentation breaks the dosimetric correlations between opposing or adjacent beam directions that cause premature convergence and noisy solutions, allowing the algorithm to find more reliable and precise treatment parameters for each segment independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If the arc is subdivided into sub-arcs groups with even distribution, then dosimetric correlations are reduced and optimal treatment parameters are more likely to be found, but the planning process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment plan qualityVSAvoidplanning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arc is segmented into sub-arcs that are grouped and evenly distributed around the patient. This segmentation reduces dosimetric correlations and improves treatment plan quality by allowing independent optimization of each group, while the systematic grouping approach keeps the increased complexity manageable through automated sequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sub-arcs are pre-grouped and sequenced before optimization begins, with groups arranged to minimize dosimetric correlations. This preliminary organization establishes an optimal processing sequence that guides the sequential optimization algorithm, improving final plan quality while avoiding the need for complex real-time adjustments during optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If sequential determination of treatment parameters is performed for sub-arcs groups, then dosimetric correlations are minimized and noise is reduced, but the computation time increases due to multiple sequential optimizations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment parameter precisionVSAvoidplanning computation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The arc is divided into multiple sub-arcs processed sequentially, which reduces dosimetric correlations and produces more precise treatment parameters with less noise. While this segmentation increases computation time compared to single-arc optimization, it significantly improves parameter reliability and reduces the need for iterative corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization is performed multiple times on partial arcs (sub-arcs) rather than attempting a single comprehensive optimization on the entire arc. This partial action approach, while requiring multiple sequential optimizations, produces superior results by avoiding the premature convergence and noise problems that plague full-arc optimization, ultimately reducing the need for additional corrective iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3773892B1Planning system for planning a volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy procedure
Publication Date: 2022.08.24 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP3773892B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3773892B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3773892B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a planning system (7) for planning a volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy procedure, wherein the volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy procedure includes rotating a radiation source (2), which is configured to emit a radiation beam (3) for treating a subject (4), along an arc around the subject, in order to apply the radiation beam to the subject in different treatment directions. A sequence of sub-arcs groups is provided, wherein a respective sub-arcs group comprises several sub-arcs of the arc, which are evenly distributed along the arc, wherein a treatment plan is generated by sequentially determining for each sub-arcs group treatment parameters, which define a property of the radiation beam, in the provided sequence. Determining the treatment parameters by using this sequence leads to an increased likelihood that really an optimal treatment plan is generated.