VNS Titration Control After Defibrillation Shock Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapies require manual titration processes that are time-consuming and inconvenient for patients due to scheduling conflicts, and there is a lack of technology to address unexpected changes in patient condition during automated titration.

Innovation Solution

An implantable medical device that adjusts VNS therapy based on detecting defibrillation shocks, reducing intensity to compensate for post-shock sensitivity, and automating the titration process to minimize patient discomfort and optimize therapeutic delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If automated titration is implemented, then titration time and patient visits are reduced, but the system cannot account for unexpected changes in patient condition such as defibrillation shocks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetitration timeVSAvoidresponse to patient condition changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors patient physiological signals (ECG, accelerometer) and uses this feedback to detect defibrillation shocks and adjust stimulation intensity accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the automated system to respond to unexpected patient condition changes while maintaining time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The implantable device autonomously detects defibrillation shocks and adjusts VNS parameters without requiring patient action or provider intervention. The system serves itself by automatically modifying therapy based on sensed physiological events, reducing the need for manual reprogramming while adapting to patient needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If defibrillation shock detection and adjustment is added to the automated titration system, then patient comfort is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient discomfortVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implantable device performs multiple functions: automated titration, defibrillation shock detection, and stimulation intensity adjustment. By combining these functions into a single multi-functional system, the patent avoids the need for separate devices while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses physiological signals (ECG, accelerometer data) as intermediaries to detect defibrillation shocks indirectly. Rather than requiring direct shock sensing, the system analyzes intermediate physiological responses, simplifying the detection mechanism while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If stimulation intensity is reduced after defibrillation shock, then patient comfort is improved, but therapeutic efficacy may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside effectsVSAvoidtherapeutic efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts stimulation intensity based on real-time detection of defibrillation shocks. Rather than using fixed intensity levels, the system modifies parameters adaptively, reducing intensity temporarily after shocks and then gradually increasing it again, optimizing both comfort and therapeutic efficacy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively reduces stimulation intensity before potential discomfort occurs by detecting defibrillation shocks and preemptively adjusting parameters. This preliminary action prevents patient discomfort while maintaining therapeutic benefits through subsequent gradual intensity increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12569682B2Automatic titration with defibrillation sensitivity compensation
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 LIVANOVA USA INC
  • US12569682B2 patent drawing
  • US12569682B2 patent drawing
  • US12569682B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of delivering neurostimulation therapy to a patient from an implantable medical device is provided. The method includes delivering, by the implantable medical device, the neurostimulation therapy to the patient. The method further includes determining, by the implantable medical device, that the patient has received a defibrillation shock from a defibrillation device. The method further includes adjusting, by the implantable medical device, the neurostimulation therapy based on determining that the patient has received the defibrillation shock.