Per-span NLI Measurement via VOA Dithering in Optical Links

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for in-service characterization of nonlinear interference (NLI) in optical fiber communication systems are limited, as they require commissioning and suffer from errors due to mis-provisioned fiber properties and complex modeling, making it challenging to optimize launch power and predict performance accurately.

Innovation Solution

The use of variable optical attenuators (VOAs) before and after each span in an optical link to isolate and measure NLI on a per-span basis, allowing for accurate estimation of noise performance and optimization of launch power through phase sensitive detection and dithering techniques, enabling in-service characterization and network-level optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If per-span NLI measurement is implemented at commissioning using the approach in U.S. Pat. No. 11,139,633, then per-span fiber nonlinear parameter measurement and modeling is enabled, but the measurement is not available once the optical link is in-service

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveper-span NLI measurement accuracyVSAvoidin-service availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts VOA settings during in-service operation to enable per-span NLI measurements without disrupting traffic. The VOAs are dithered (small periodic adjustments) to modulate the signal power into each span, allowing real-time measurement of nonlinear interference while the link remains operational

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (VOA settings and amplifier gains) to isolate and measure NLI from individual spans. By adjusting these parameters and observing the resulting changes in total noise at the receiver, the system can extract per-span NLI contributions while maintaining service

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If existing power control approaches use modeling with provisioned or measured parameters, then optimal launch power can be obtained, but errors from multiple sources reduce accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control automationVSAvoidoptimal launch power accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by measuring actual per-span NLI contributions and using this information to adjust launch powers. The measured NLI data feeds back into the power optimization process, allowing the system to converge on optimal launch powers based on actual system performance rather than relying solely on theoretical models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own measured performance data to optimize its operation. By measuring NLI from each span and using this information to adjust launch powers, the system performs self-optimization without requiring external intervention or complex external modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If modeling of system performance and optimal launch power is performed, then launch power optimization is achieved, but significant computing power is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaunch power optimizationVSAvoidcomputing power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex computational modeling with direct physical measurement. Instead of using sophisticated software models to predict NLI and optimize power, the system directly measures NLI from each span using VOAs and receivers, then uses this measured data to guide power adjustments, significantly reducing computing requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If VOAs are dithered to determine linear and nonlinear noise contributions, then per-span NLI measurement is enabled, but the measurement process must not disrupt in-service channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveper-span noise contribution measurementVSAvoidin-service channel performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies small partial dithering to the VOAs rather than large adjustments. These small periodic variations in VOA settings are sufficient to modulate the signal for measurement purposes while remaining below the threshold that would disrupt in-service channel performance or trigger error conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate measurement of per-span NLI without disrupting in-service channels, optimizing operating conditions, validating noise modeling, and confirming restoration paths, thereby enhancing the capacity and reliability of optical communication systems.

Implementation Method 1

An enabler is to have a pair of variable optical attenuators (VOAs) before and optionally after the line fiber of each span, where the first VOA before the fiber is for changing power into the span under test

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical attenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

observing total noise, at an optical receiver, from all of the plurality of spans

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12132515B2Localized span launch power control for network level optimization
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 CIENA CORP
  • US12132515B2 patent drawing
  • US12132515B2 patent drawing
  • US12132515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of optimizing launch power for each span in an optical system with a plurality of spans are provided. In an embodiment, a method includes varying power on a span under test of the plurality of spans; observing performance measurements related to of one or more channels, at corresponding optical receivers; and one of setting launch power for the span under test and repeating the varying and observing, responsive to the observed measurements.