Voice-AI Event Warnings for Faster Insurance Claim Intake

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing insurance claim processes are inefficient and time-consuming, often causing frustration for policy holders and delays for providers due to manual procedures and lack of personalized user experiences.

Innovation Solution

A computing system utilizing large language models and artificial intelligence to automate and individualize insurance claim processes through adaptive flow engines, voice-AI technology, and machine-learning techniques for efficient information gathering, settlement negotiation, and service assignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual claim processing procedures are used, then claim handlers can personally assess each claim, but processing time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim assessment qualityVSAvoidclaim processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an AI-based automated claim assessment system as an intermediary between the claimant and human adjusters. This automated system pre-evaluates claims using machine learning models trained on historical data, providing recommendations to human adjusters. This intermediary layer maintains assessment quality through AI accuracy while dramatically reducing processing time for routine claims, resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the claim processing workflow into different tiers: fully automated assessment for straightforward claims using AI models, and human-adjuster review for complex or high-value claims. This segmentation allows routine claims to be processed rapidly by AI while reserving human expertise for cases requiring judgment, thereby improving overall productivity without sacrificing assessment quality on complex claims.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If standardized claim processes are used, then processing efficiency improves, but personalized user experiences are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing efficiencyVSAvoiduser experience personalization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic claim processing pathways that adapt to each claim's characteristics. The system automatically adjusts the level of automation and personalization based on claim complexity, type, and value. Simple claims follow streamlined automated processes for efficiency, while complex claims receive more personalized human attention. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by providing efficiency where appropriate and personalization where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing qualities to different segments of the claim portfolio. High-volume, low-complexity claims receive standardized automated processing with efficient turnaround, while low-volume, high-complexity claims receive personalized human review. This local differentiation of processing quality allows the organization to maximize efficiency for the majority of claims while maintaining personalization for cases where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If more claim information is collected, then claim assessment accuracy improves, but information gathering time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim assessment accuracyVSAvoidinformation gathering duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary automated data collection and validation before claims reach human adjusters. The system automatically gathers relevant information from multiple sources, validates data quality, and prepares comprehensive claim packages in advance. This preliminary action ensures that when human adjusters review claims, all necessary information is already assembled and verified, improving assessment accuracy without requiring extended information gathering during the review process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual information gathering and validation processes with automated digital systems. Machine learning models automatically extract, verify, and cross-reference claim data from various sources, substituting the mechanical process of manual information collection with automated computational processes. This substitution maintains high assessment accuracy while dramatically reducing the time required to gather and verify claim information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12568147B1Voice-AI warning system for predicted events
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 ASSURED INSURANCE TECH INC
  • US12568147B1 patent drawing
  • US12568147B1 patent drawing
  • US12568147B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include a computing system, computer-implemented method and non-transitory computer readable medium for predicting events and voice-AI warnings. According to embodiments, data corresponding to a predicted event is received, and users that are predicted to be affected by the predicted event are identified. A voice-AI engine is initiated to perform a voice-AI call to the identified users, where the voice-AI call provides a warning to each of the users.