Voice Cancellation Chamber with Sound Decelerator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing voice muffling devices are ineffective in preventing the uncontrolled propagation of vocal sounds, making private phone conversations difficult in public spaces, as they require an airtight seal that restricts breathing and are not practical for everyday use.

Innovation Solution

A voice cancellation system featuring a sound muffling chamber with a microphone to detect vocal sounds, a sound decelerator to slow sound waves, and a signal processing system generating out-of-phase sound waves to destructively interfere with the original vocal sounds, ensuring privacy and minimizing disturbance to others.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If an airtight mask is used to prevent vocal sound leakage, then voice privacy is improved, but breathing and vocalization become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoice privacyVSAvoidbreathing and vocalization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical passive muffling system (airtight mask) with an active electronic system consisting of microphones, signal processors, and speakers. The system captures the user's voice, processes it electronically to reduce intelligibility, and plays back the modified audio, thereby achieving voice privacy without requiring an airtight seal that would restrict breathing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary electronic processing system between the user's voice and the surrounding environment. Instead of directly blocking sound waves with a physical barrier, the system uses microphones to capture voice, signal processors to modify it, and speakers to emit the processed audio, creating a mediated solution that preserves breathability while maintaining privacy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If ventilation capacity of airtight masks is improved, then breathing becomes easier, but effectiveness of voice muffling diminishes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebreathingVSAvoidvoice muffling effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the fundamental contradiction by replacing the mechanical airtight mask system with an active electronic system. The new system uses microphones to capture voice inside a breathable chamber, processes the audio signal to reduce intelligibility, and plays back the modified audio through speakers, thereby maintaining both ventilation capacity and voice muffling effectiveness simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of time

If a sound decelerator is added to slow sound waves, then processing time is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound processing timeVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical sound decelerator (tortuous path structure) with an electronic timing approach. The signal processor captures the voice signal, applies the appropriate time delay electronically to match the acoustic path delay, and processes the signal accordingly. This electronic timing method achieves the same effect as a mechanical decelerator without adding physical complexity to the device structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the loudness and intelligibility of the user's voice to the surrounding environment while allowing comfortable breathing and easy use, providing a robust sound barrier that is elastic and foldable for convenience.

Implementation Method 1

the sound decelerator includes material to increase a traveling time of sound waves from the sound muffling chamber to the sound silencing chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound wave propagation: Sound

Implementation Method 2

the voice cancellation signal includes one or more frequency components having a same frequency and amplitude but a 180 degrees out of phase from one or more frequency components of the voice signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDestructive interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS11908441B1System and method for a speaking chamber with voice cancellation
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 KIM KEVIN CHONG
  • US11908441B1 patent drawing
  • US11908441B1 patent drawing
  • US11908441B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A sound muffling chamber covers a nose and mouth in an airtight manner. The sound muffling chamber includes a microphone that detects vocal sound waves in the sound muffling chamber and generates a voice signal. A digital signal processing system analyzes the voice signal and generates a voice cancellation signal. A sound silencing chamber includes a speaker that generates out of phase sound waves in response to the voice cancellation signal that superimposes on and cancels the vocal sound waves. A sound decelerator is positioned between the sound muffling chamber and the sound silencing chamber and configured to increase a traveling time of the vocal sound waves such that the vocal sound waves' arrival at the sound silencing chamber may be synchronized with the arrival of a voice cancellation signal. The sound muffling chamber may include inflatable cells separated by slats such that the sound muffling chamber is foldable.