Voice Coil Arrays for Reduced Magnet Mass and Inductance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional voice coil actuators require significant permanent magnet and flux conducting material, leading to high costs and limited frequency bandwidth due to high inductance, necessitating a design that minimizes these materials while maintaining force output performance.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a one-dimensional or two-dimensional voice coil array with a magnet assembly and suspension system, utilizing flux concentrators and shorting rings to reduce magnetic flux reliance and inductance, allowing for a more compact and efficient actuator with lower material usage and increased frequency bandwidth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a monolithic voice coil actuator design is used, then force output performance is achieved, but the amount of permanent magnet and flux conducting material is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of permanent magnet materialVSAvoidforce output performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monolithic voice coil actuator into multiple smaller coil assemblies arranged in an array. Each coil assembly generates a portion of the total force, and the segmented structure allows for optimized magnetic flux paths that reduce the total amount of permanent magnet material required while maintaining the overall force output performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If conventional voice coil designs are used, then force generation is adequate, but coil inductance is high which limits frequency bandwidth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency bandwidthVSAvoidcoil inductance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the single large coil into multiple smaller coils in an array, the total inductance is reduced because each small coil has lower self-inductance and the magnetic flux paths are shorter and more direct. This segmentation enables higher frequency operation while maintaining force generation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Force

If more permanent magnet material is used, then magnetic flux is stronger, but cost and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic flux strengthVSAvoidweight of permanent magnet material
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality optimization by positioning permanent magnets and flux conducting elements only where they are most effective in each segmented coil assembly. The magnetic flux paths are locally optimized to maximize flux density at the coil locations while minimizing the total volume of permanent magnet material required throughout the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Force

If flux conducting material is increased, then magnetic flux conduction is improved, but device weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic flux conductionVSAvoidweight of flux conducting material
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes unnecessary flux conducting material from the structure, retaining only the essential elements needed to guide magnetic flux through the segmented coil assemblies. This extraction reduces the total amount of flux conducting material and associated weight while maintaining adequate magnetic flux conduction for force generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves the same force output as monolithic actuators with reduced permanent magnet and flux conducting material, resulting in a lighter, more cost-effective design with enhanced frequency bandwidth.

Implementation Method 1

the magnet assembly comprises an array of lateral and vertical permanent magnets in contact with flux concentrators, wherein the flux concentrators correspond to and are aligned with the coils of the coil assembly, such that a concentrated uniform magnetic flux is directed laterally through the coils

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

The interaction between the current passing through the coil and the magnetic field causes the coil to produce forces perpendicular to the current and the magnetic field, which drive an inertial mass to produce output force into the supporting structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

Some devices use a conducting loop, called a shorting ring or Faraday ring, in the coil flux path. Current induced in this loop counteracts the coil flux, which raises the path reluctance and thereby the inductance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11652395B1Voice coil arrays
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
  • US11652395B1 patent drawing
  • US11652395B1 patent drawing
  • US11652395B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Inertial actuators are provided, which use a one-dimensional or a two-dimensional voice coil array to achieve the same force output performance as a monolithic actuator. The voice coil arrays use less permanent magnet and flux conducting material, and have a lower inductance, while achieving increased frequency bandwidth.