Voice Processing Device Dynamic Feature Update

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional speaking person recognition technologies face challenges in accurately identifying voices over time due to changes in voice quality, such as the Lombard effect, and inefficiently manage registered features, leading to erroneous determinations and increased processing loads.

Innovation Solution

A voice processing device that utilizes a deep neural network to calculate features from input voice signals and compares them with registered features, updating or adding them based on similarity thresholds to maintain accurate identification, while managing feature updates to reduce memory capacity and processing load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If registered features are continuously updated with new voice data, then voice recognition accuracy is improved, but memory capacity consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoice recognition accuracyVSAvoidmemory capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the state of registered features from static to dynamic by implementing automatic updates when similarity thresholds are met. When a new voice sample sufficiently resembles an existing registered feature, the system updates that feature's parameters to incorporate the new data, thereby improving recognition accuracy without unbounded memory growth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system discards redundant voice data by updating existing registered features rather than continuously adding new ones. When similarity exceeds the threshold, the new voice sample is used to refresh/update the existing feature representation, effectively discarding the need to store separate copies while recovering and maintaining recognition accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Reliability

If multiple registered features are maintained for each person, then voice recognition reliability is improved, but processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoice recognition reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic feature registration where the number and state of registered features per person is not fixed but adapts based on similarity thresholds. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain multiple features when necessary for reliability while avoiding unnecessary feature proliferation that would increase processing load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses similarity threshold parameters to control feature registration decisions. By adjusting these threshold parameters, the system can optimize the balance between maintaining sufficient features for reliable recognition and limiting the total number of features to manage processing load efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If voice features are updated frequently, then adaptation to voice quality changes is improved, but erroneous determinations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to voice quality changesVSAvoiderroneous determinations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by establishing similarity thresholds that prevent premature or inappropriate feature updates. Before updating a registered feature, the system first checks whether the new voice sample meets the similarity criterion, thereby preventing erroneous determinations that would result from updating with insufficiently similar or incorrect voice samples

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback through similarity threshold comparison to control the feature update process. Each new voice sample is compared against existing registered features, and updates only occur when the similarity feedback indicates sufficient match, thereby adapting to voice quality changes while maintaining reliability by filtering out poor matches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240282312A1Voice processing device, method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 PANASONIC AUTOMOTIVE SYST CO LTD
  • US20240282312A1 patent drawing
  • US20240282312A1 patent drawing
  • US20240282312A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A voice processing device includes a calculation unit and a determination processing unit. The calculation unit calculates a first feature being a feature of an input voice signal. When a similarity between the first feature and a second feature out of one or more registered features having been registered is equal to or larger than a first threshold, the determination processing unit makes determination that the input voice signal is a voice of a first registered person out of registered persons. The first registered person corresponds to the second feature. When the similarity is equal to or larger than the first threshold and smaller than a second threshold, the determination processing unit adds the first feature to the registered features or updates the registered features with the first feature.