Voice Recognition Device Wake-Up Arbitration
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing voice recognition devices face mutual interference issues when multiple devices respond simultaneously to a waking-up voice signal, leading to inappropriate responses and user dissatisfaction.
Innovation Solution
A method where multiple voice recognition devices form an area network with a central device and non-central devices, analyzing voice signals to calculate response factors based on energy values and matching degrees, and determining a pending device to respond, thereby avoiding simultaneous responses.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If multiple voice recognition devices respond simultaneously to a waking-up voice signal, then all devices can serve the user, but mutual interference occurs and response accuracy deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a coordinator device as an intermediary that manages wake-up arbitration among multiple voice recognition devices. The coordinator receives wake-up signals from all devices, determines which device should respond based on predefined arbitration rules, and notifies the selected device. This mediator mechanism resolves the conflict between allowing multiple devices to respond (for service coverage) and preventing mutual interference (for response accuracy).
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements preliminary arbitration before actual response execution. All voice recognition devices that detect a wake-up signal enter a contention state where they exchange arbitration information with the coordinator. The coordinator pre-determines the winning device based on arbitration rules (such as device ID comparison, signal strength, or priority levels) before any device generates a response. This preliminary action prevents simultaneous responses and ensures only one device responds accurately.
2Adaptability or versatility
If all voice recognition devices in the area network wake up and respond to a voice signal, then user coverage is maximized, but mutual interference and broadcasting conflicts occur
Solution Approach 1:
The coordinator device acts as a central mediator that receives wake-up notifications from all devices in the area network. It applies arbitration rules to select a single responding device while notifying others to remain silent. This intermediary mechanism maintains broad user coverage (since all devices monitor for wake-up signals) while eliminating mutual interference (by ensuring only one device responds).
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements preliminary anti-action by having the coordinator send notification messages to non-selected devices, instructing them not to respond. This preemptive suppression prevents potential broadcasting conflicts before they occur. The selected device is authorized to respond while others are actively prevented from interfering, thus eliminating mutual interference while maintaining the capability for broad user coverage.
3Productivity
If multiple devices broadcast responses simultaneously, then service availability is high, but response quality and user experience deteriorate due to interference
Solution Approach 1:
The coordinator device serves as a mediator that manages the response arbitration process. It receives wake-up signals from all devices, applies arbitration rules to determine the single responding device, and coordinates the response timing. This ensures high service availability (since the system always responds to wake-up signals) while maintaining high response quality (by preventing simultaneous broadcasting that would cause interference).
Solution Approach 2:
The arbitration process occurs preliminarily before the actual response is generated. The coordinator determines which device should respond and notifies it in advance. This preliminary assignment ensures that when the response is executed, only one device broadcasts, eliminating interference and maintaining high response quality. The service availability is preserved because the arbitration process is rapid and ensures a response is always selected.
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3~4
Figure 5~6
AI summary
A wake-up response method for voice recognition devices, and the voice recognition devices and a computer storage medium. Multiple voice recognition devices constitute an area network, and the multiple voice recognition devices are one hub device and at least one non-hub device, respectively. The wake-up response method comprises: a hub device analyzes an acquired voice signal to obtain a response factor of the hub device (S201); receive a response factor of a non-hub device, the response factor of the non-hub device being obtained by analyzing an acquired voice signal by the non-hub device (S202); compare the response factor of the hub device and the response factor of the non-hub device to determine a voice recognition device ready to respond (S203), the voice recognition device ready to respond being a voice recognition device in the area network to respond to a voice signal. The wake-up response method can determine one device responding to the voice signal among the multiple voice recognition devices capable of responding to the voice signal.