Interactive Voice Router Blending Human Agents and Speech Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current interactive response systems, such as IVR and speech recognition technologies, often provide a less than satisfactory customer experience due to their limited ability to understand everyday language and require customers to respond in a narrow range, leading to high agent turnover and training costs, and offshore outsourcing can result in misunderstandings and poor service quality.

Innovation Solution

An interactive response system that uses a software-based router to seamlessly blend human customer service agents and speech recognition, allowing multiple agents to evaluate customer input for accurate interpretation, providing agent portability, simplified training, and dynamic workload balancing, while ensuring secure handling of sensitive data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If traditional IVR systems with menu structures are used, then system automation is improved, but customer experience and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem automationVSAvoidcustomer experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces human agents as intermediaries between the automated IVR system and customers. The human agent listens to the customer's natural language input, interprets the intent, and translates it into commands for the automated system, thereby bridging the gap between automated efficiency and natural interaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The interaction process is divided into distinct segments: the customer speaks naturally to the human agent, the agent processes the input separately, and then the automated system executes the interpreted commands. This segmentation allows each component to operate in its optimal mode

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Extent of automation

If speech recognition technology with predetermined response ranges is used, then automation is improved, but understanding of everyday language and adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveautomationVSAvoidlanguage understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The human agent serves as an intermediary who bridges the limitation of predetermined speech recognition responses. The agent understands everyday language nuances and translates them into the structured format required by the automated system, enhancing adaptability without reducing automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The human agent performs multiple functions: listening to natural speech, interpreting intent, translating to system commands, and handling edge cases. This multi-functionality allows the system to handle diverse language patterns while maintaining automated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If one human agent assists a customer for the full duration of the interaction, then customer service quality is improved, but agent availability and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer service qualityVSAvoidagent availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The customer interaction is segmented into portions that require human interpretation versus automated processing. The human agent only handles the portions requiring interpretation, while automated systems handle routine tasks, allowing the agent to serve multiple customers simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The human agent acts as an intermediary for specific interpretation tasks rather than managing the entire interaction. This allows the agent to be more efficient and available for multiple customers while maintaining service quality for complex cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If multiple human agents are used to interpret customer input, then accuracy is improved, but system complexity and cost deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpretation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple agents provide interpretations that are compared and validated against each other. The system uses feedback from multiple sources to determine the most accurate interpretation, improving precision through cross-validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple human agent interpretations with automated speech recognition results. By merging these different interpretation sources, the system achieves higher accuracy while distributing the complexity across multiple components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS7606718B2Apparatus and method for processing service interactions
Publication Date: 2009.10.20 ARES VENTURE FINANCE
  • US7606718B2 patent drawing
  • US7606718B2 patent drawing
  • US7606718B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interactive voice and data response system that directs input to a voice, text, and web-capable software-based router, which is able to intelligently respond to the input by drawing on a combination of human agents, advanced speech recognition and expert systems, connected to the router via a TCP/IP network. The digitized input is broken down into components so that the customer interaction is managed as a series of small tasks rather than one ongoing conversation. The router manages the interactions and keeps pace with a real-time conversation. The system utilizes both speech recognition and human intelligence for purposes of interpreting customer utterance or customer text. The system may use more than one human agent, or both human agents and speech recognition software, to interpret simultaneously the same component for error-checking and interpretation accuracy.