Voice-to-Text Transcription Language Selection via Country Code and User Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current voice-to-text transcription systems face limitations due to the need for manual transcription, which is costly and inefficient, and automatic systems struggle with language recognition, leading to corruption of post-processing steps and restricted geographical extension.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining the correct language for voice-to-text transcription based on caller and recipient preferences, using phone country codes, stored settings, and automatic selection, allowing callers to choose or input languages for transcription.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual transcription is used, then transcription accuracy is improved, but labor cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranscription accuracyVSAvoidtranscription time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic language detection and transcription without requiring manual intervention. The answering machine automatically detects the language of incoming voice messages and performs transcription, eliminating the need for human operators while maintaining transcription capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical transcription processes with automated electronic language detection and transcription algorithms. The system uses computational methods to identify languages and transcribe speech, substituting human labor with automated technological processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automatic transcription is used, then productivity is improved, but language recognition accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranscription efficiencyVSAvoidlanguage recognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary language detection before transcription. By first identifying the language of the incoming message and notifying the user, the system prepares the transcription process with accurate language information, ensuring both automation and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the user about detected languages and allows correction or confirmation. This feedback mechanism ensures that even with automatic detection, the final language identification is accurate, combining automated efficiency with human verification when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple languages are supported, then adaptability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanguage support capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The answering machine is designed with universal language detection and transcription capabilities that can handle multiple languages through a single integrated system. The same hardware and software infrastructure supports various languages, eliminating the need for separate systems for each language.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary language detection module that translates various input languages into a standardized format for transcription. This intermediary layer simplifies the overall system architecture by providing a uniform interface regardless of the input language.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If language detection is automated, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to incorrect language identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanguage selection simplicityVSAvoidlanguage identification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated language detection and presents the result to the user for confirmation before proceeding with transcription. This preliminary action maintains ease of operation while allowing user verification to ensure reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback about the detected language to the user and allows correction. This feedback loop maintains operational simplicity while improving reliability by enabling user intervention when the automatic detection may be incorrect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9966072B2Method and devices for language determination for voice to text transcription of phone calls
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 SARONIKOS TRADING & SERVICES UNIPESSOAL LDA

AI summary

Methods, and devices and systems, for example an answering machine system, are provided for determining a language among a plurality of languages available for a voice to text transcription of phone calls between a caller and a recipient. In the method, at least two of said available languages are proposed to the caller. The proposed languages are based on a phone country code corresponding to said caller, a phone country code corresponding to said recipient, a language from a set of languages available for the transcription by said answering machine system, or a language selected automatically on the basis of parameters set by the caller or the recipient. The caller selects said language by interacting with said answering machine system, and a corresponding voice message is transcribed into text of the selected language for forwarding to said recipient.