Volatile PFAS-FVC Analysis Trap for CO2 Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing preconcentration systems for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) analysis struggle to efficiently remove carbon dioxide (CO2) while retaining compounds more and less volatile than CO2, particularly at high CO2 levels, leading to interference and loss of target compounds.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a primary cold sorbent trap that concentrates the sample, followed by forward flushing to a secondary trap, with CO2 removal techniques including vacuum-assisted expansion or temperature-based purging, allowing for the recovery of volatile and less volatile compounds without CO2 interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If CO2 is removed using conventional preconcentration systems, then CO2 interference is reduced, but compounds more volatile than CO2 (such as CF4) are lost during the process

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 interferenceVSAvoidloss of volatile compounds
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the trap into two distinct sections: a first section that retains compounds more volatile than CO2 (such as CF4) and a second section that retains CO2 and compounds less volatile than CO2. This segmentation allows selective removal of CO2 while preserving volatile compounds during the analysis process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A small intermediate volume section is positioned between the first and second sections to act as a buffer zone. This intermediary section prevents direct contact between the volatile compounds in the first section and the CO2 removal process in the second section, thereby preventing loss of volatile compounds while still achieving CO2 removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If CO2 is not removed from the sample, then volatile compounds can be analyzed at higher volumes, but CO2 causes interference and signal loss in the detector

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample volumeVSAvoiddetector signal
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The trap is segmented into distinct sections that physically separate volatile compounds from CO2, allowing the system to accept larger sample volumes that contain CO2 while preventing CO2 from reaching the detector where it would cause signal interference and loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a single trap is used for both volatile and less volatile compounds, then device complexity is reduced, but selective CO2 removal cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of trapsVSAvoidselective compound retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than using multiple separate traps, the system segments a single trap into functional sections with different retention characteristics. The first section is optimized for volatile compounds while the second section handles CO2 and less volatile compounds, achieving selective removal without requiring multiple discrete trap devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The single trap is designed to perform multiple functions: it can retain volatile compounds, retain CO2, and enable selective CO2 removal. By integrating these functions into one device, the system maintains simplicity while achieving the versatility needed for selective compound analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient removal of CO2, allowing for accurate analysis of trace compounds at higher volumes, reducing the need for multiple analyses and improving sensitivity and resolution in GCMS, particularly for PFAS and volatile fluorinated compounds.

Implementation Method 1

A primary cold sorbent trap concentrates the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

the primary trap is placed under vacuum and warmed while monitoring the expansion of CO2 from the primary trap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 3

the system warms the primary trap while the primary trap is isolated from the secondary trap to purge CO2 from the primary trap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS20250237627A1Volatile PFAS-fvc analysis system and method
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 ENTECH INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US20250237627A1 patent drawing
  • US20250237627A1 patent drawing
  • US20250237627A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A primary trap concentrates the sample, followed by forward flushing of retained compounds more volatile than CO2 to a secondary trap. In some embodiments, prior to CO2 elution, the primary trap is isolated from the secondary trap and pressure in the primary trap is reduced to sub-atmospheric. At this time, a pressure sensor measures expansion of CO2 into a vacuum reservoir to determine the amount of CO2 and CO2 is removed. Optionally, inert gas is used to eliminate any remaining CO2, either at positive pressure instead of removing CO2 under vacuum, or as an optional additional step after removing CO2 under vacuum. After the CO2 is removed, the primary trap is heated and backflushed to the secondary trap, which is then preheated and either injected directly to a GCMS, or further condensed using an open tubular focusing trap for even faster injection rates into the GCMS.