Integrated Volt/VAR Control Optimization Algorithm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional power distribution networks face challenges in maintaining optimal voltage conditions and reactive power flow due to the independent operation of voltage regulators and switched capacitor banks, leading to suboptimal results and limited real-time optimization capabilities.

Innovation Solution

The method involves modeling the network with combined nodes and loads, identifying and eliminating 'trivial' lines or buses, and applying compensation to reduce system complexity, enabling faster and more accurate load flow calculations through integrated volt/VAR control optimization algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional independent operation of voltage regulators and switched capacitor banks is used, then device complexity is reduced, but optimization effectiveness and voltage control precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage control precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple voltage regulators and switched capacitor banks into an integrated volt/VAR control system. The optimization algorithm coordinates all these devices together, treating them as a unified system rather than independent units. This merging enables centralized optimization of voltage profiles and reactive power flow across the entire distribution feeder, resolving the technical contradiction by achieving superior voltage control precision through integrated control while managing device complexity through systematic coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated volt/VAR control system performs multiple functions simultaneously: voltage regulation, reactive power compensation, and loss minimization. The optimization algorithm handles all these objectives in a unified framework, allowing the system to achieve precise voltage control while also optimizing reactive power flow and minimizing losses. This multi-functionality approach resolves the contradiction by demonstrating that increased system integration enables comprehensive optimization across multiple parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If detailed network modeling is performed for accurate optimization, then optimization accuracy is improved, but computation time increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates 'trivial' lines and buses from the network model that contribute minimally to the objective function. By identifying and removing these insignificant elements, the system reduces the computational burden of detailed network modeling while preserving the accuracy of optimization results for the critical portions of the network. This extraction approach resolves the contradiction by maintaining optimization accuracy for important network elements while reducing computation time through selective simplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of modeling detail to different parts of the network based on their importance. Critical network elements receive detailed modeling and optimization attention, while less important elements are simplified or aggregated. This local quality approach ensures that computation resources are focused on areas where they most impact optimization accuracy, resolving the contradiction between detailed modeling and computation time by allocating modeling effort proportionally to network element importance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If the full network is modeled without simplification, then optimization accuracy is maintained, but the system cannot handle larger distribution systems with available hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem scalabilityVSAvoidoptimization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large distribution network into manageable components by identifying and eliminating trivial lines and buses. This segmentation reduces the overall system size into smaller, computationally tractable subsystems that can be processed by available hardware. The segmentation is performed in a way that preserves the essential electrical characteristics and optimization objectives, allowing the system to handle larger distribution networks while maintaining optimization accuracy through structured decomposition of the network model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2482417B1Systems, Methods, and Apparatus for Accelerating Volt / VAR Load Flow Optimization
Publication Date: 2019.11.27 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP2482417B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2482417B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2482417B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Certain embodiments of the invention may include systems 300 and methods 100 for accelerating volt/VAR load flow optimization. According to an example embodiment of the invention, a method is provided for accelerating load flow 102 for integrated volt/var control (IVVC) optimization. The method can include evaluating load flow 102 on lines of an electrical network, identifying combinable network lines, combining the identified combinable network nodes to reduce network complexity, and determining load flow optimization for IVVC based at least in part on the reduced complexity network.