Decentralized Volt/VAR Control for Power Loss Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional distributed control schemes in electrical distribution systems effectively maintain voltage within acceptable ranges but fail to optimize active power losses, power factor, and voltage flatness across segments of the system.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized coordinated control system using a network interface and data processing circuitry to simulate and optimize equipment configurations in electrical distribution systems, including load tap changing transformers and capacitor banks, to manage voltage, active power losses, and power factor while preventing voltage violations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If distributed control scheme is used to maintain voltage within acceptable ranges, then voltage stability is improved, but active power losses and power factor optimization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage stabilityVSAvoidactive power losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a coordinator controller as an intermediary component that receives measurements from multiple local controllers and sends coordinated control signals back to them. This coordinator enables centralized optimization of active power losses and power factor while local controllers maintain voltage stability, resolving the contradiction between voltage reliability and energy loss reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of multiple independent local controllers into a coordinated control system. By combining local voltage control functions with centralized loss optimization functions in a unified control architecture, the system achieves both voltage stability and active power loss reduction simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If distributed control scheme is used to maintain voltage within acceptable ranges, then voltage stability is improved, but power factor optimization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage stabilityVSAvoidpower factor optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The coordinator controller acts as an intermediary that aggregates power factor information from local controllers and implements coordinated compensation strategies. This allows power factor optimization across the entire system while local controllers continue to maintain their voltage stability functions independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed with multi-functionality, where local controllers handle voltage regulation and the coordinator controller handles power factor optimization and loss reduction. This universal control architecture enables the system to perform multiple functions simultaneously without compromising voltage stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If decentralized coordinated control is implemented to optimize active power losses, then energy efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactive power lossesVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into local controllers and a coordinator controller, each with specific functions. Local controllers handle basic voltage regulation while the coordinator handles optimization functions. This segmentation reduces overall complexity by distributing control functions rather than requiring a single complex centralized controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Local controllers autonomously perform voltage regulation based on local measurements, requiring minimal intervention from the coordinator. This self-service capability at the local level reduces the computational burden and complexity of the central coordinator, making the overall system more manageable despite its enhanced optimization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8761954B2Devices and methods for decentralized coordinated volt/VAR control
Publication Date: 2014.06.24 GE DIGITAL HLDG LLC
  • US8761954B2 patent drawing
  • US8761954B2 patent drawing
  • US8761954B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices and methods for decentralized coordinated Volt/VAR control are provided. Such a device may allow, for example, an operational parameter such as voltage, power losses, a combination of these, and/or power factor to be optimized on a segment of an electrical distribution system under certain conditions. For example, a controller may include a network interface to receive measurements and data processing circuitry to optimize a voltage deviation, active power losses, or a combination thereof, based at least in part on the total load on the segment of the electrical distribution system.