Voltage Drop Detection Circuit with Fuse Blow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic devices face damage due to unregulated voltages and excessive currents caused by failures in voltage converters, leading to costly replacements.

Innovation Solution

Circuitry is configured to detect a voltage decrease at a threshold time-rate-of-change, blowing a fuse to prevent power control circuitry from resuming operation and discharging storage capacitors, thus protecting sensitive components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If voltage converters are used to shift electrical voltage to operating levels, then components can operate at required voltage levels, but converter failures can cause unregulated voltages and excessive currents that damage sensitive components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent protectionVSAvoidunregulated voltage and excessive current
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The circuit performs preliminary detection of voltage drops at excessive rates of change before damage can occur. The detection circuitry continuously monitors voltage conditions and triggers protective action (blowing the fuse) before unregulated voltages can reach sensitive components, preventing damage rather than responding after failure occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A fuse serves as an intermediary protective element between the power control circuitry and sensitive components. When the detection circuit identifies dangerous voltage conditions, it activates the fuse to blow, creating a physical break that isolates sensitive components from harmful voltages and currents. The fuse acts as a sacrificial mediator that protects the more valuable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If power control circuitry automatically resumes operation after a fault, then system availability is improved, but damaged components may be exposed to harmful voltages again

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem availabilityVSAvoidcomponent safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit receives feedback from the fuse status to determine whether to permit operation resumption. When the fuse is blown, the control circuit detects this condition and generates a control signal that prevents the power control circuitry from resuming operation. This feedback mechanism ensures that protective isolation is maintained until the fuse is replaced, preventing repeated exposure to harmful conditions while allowing normal operation when conditions are safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the state of the fuse itself to control the resumption logic. The blown fuse creates a detectable condition (open circuit or voltage change) that automatically triggers the control circuit to maintain protective isolation. The system serves itself by using the protective element's state to govern its own operational permissions, eliminating the need for external intervention to maintain protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of repair

If fuse replacement is allowed without preventing operation resumption, then maintenance is simplified, but sensitive components remain vulnerable to damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuse replacementVSAvoidrepeated voltage damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit continuously monitors fuse status and provides feedback control signals to the power control circuitry. As long as the fuse remains blown (indicating a previous fault condition), the control circuit maintains the protective isolation state, preventing operation resumption. This ensures that components remain protected during the entire period from fault occurrence through fuse replacement, eliminating the window of vulnerability that would exist if operation could resume automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8730627B2Decreasing voltage detection with control signaling
Publication Date: 2014.05.20 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US8730627B2 patent drawing
  • US8730627B2 patent drawing
  • US8730627B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Illustrative circuits and methods are provided. Circuitry is configured to detect a decrease in a monitored voltage at greater than a threshold rate. A fuse is deliberately blown in response to the detection. Power control circuitry is disabled and prevented from resuming normal operations by way of control signaling. The blown fuse ensures that at least one control signal is maintained until the blown fuse is replaced by service personnel. Shunt circuitry optionally discharges storage capacitors of the power control circuitry. Sensitive electronic components are protected against over-voltage or overcurrent damage in accordance with the present teachings.