Volume Leveler Control Using Real-Time Audio Content Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional audio processing systems require manual preset selection and lack continuous parameter adjustment, leading to inconvenient user experiences and audible artifacts when transitioning between different audio content types.

Innovation Solution

An audio processing apparatus that includes an audio classifier to identify audio types in real-time and an adjusting unit to continuously adjust audio improving devices such as dialog enhancers, surround virtualizers, volume levelers, and equalizers based on confidence values, enabling automatic configuration and smooth transitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual preset selection is used for audio processing, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically classifies audio content and adjusts processing parameters without requiring user intervention. The audio classifier continuously analyzes the input signal and the adjusting unit autonomously modifies parameters of audio improving devices, enabling the system to serve itself rather than requiring manual preset selection from users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static preset-based processing to dynamic continuous parameter adjustment. The adjusting unit continuously modifies parameters based on real-time audio classification results, allowing the audio processing characteristics to adapt dynamically to changing content types and transitions between different audio genres.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-generated harmful factors

If discrete preset switching is used, then device complexity is reduced, but audible artifacts increase during transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudible artifactsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous parameter adjustment rather than discrete switching. The adjusting unit continuously modifies processing parameters based on real-time audio classification, ensuring smooth transitions between different audio content types without the abrupt changes that cause audible artifacts in preset-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If automatic audio classification is implemented, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The audio processing system is segmented into distinct functional modules: an audio classifier unit that performs content analysis and an adjusting unit that modifies processing parameters. This modular segmentation allows the system to achieve high adaptability through specialized components while managing overall complexity through clear functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If continuous parameter adjustment is used, then audio quality improves, but loss of time increases due to processing overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio qualityVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial adjustment by modifying only the necessary processing parameters based on audio content classification, rather than adjusting all parameters continuously. This selective approach maintains audio quality while reducing processing overhead and time loss compared to comprehensive continuous adjustment of all system parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12166460B2Volume leveler controller and controlling method
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORP
  • US12166460B2 patent drawing
  • US12166460B2 patent drawing
  • US12166460B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Volume leveler controller and controlling method are disclosed. In one embodiment, A volume leveler controller includes an audio content classifier for identifying the content type of an audio signal in real time; and an adjusting unit for adjusting a volume leveler in a continuous manner based on the content type as identified. The adjusting unit may configured to positively correlate the dynamic gain of the volume leveler with informative content types of the audio signal, and negatively correlate the dynamic gain of the volume leveler with interfering content types of the audio signal.