Vortex-enhanced heat exchanger

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current HVAC&R systems using round-tube plate-fin heat exchangers in evaporator sections face inefficiencies due to rudimentary fin designs, leading to large size, high weight, and increased costs, with existing fin enhancements becoming ineffective under frosting conditions.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating vortex generators of triangular or rectangular shapes positioned at a nonzero angle relative to airflow, creating nozzle-like passages between heat exchange tubes, which enhance convective heat transfer and frost distribution while maintaining low pressure drop and cost-efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If rudimentary fin designs are used in round-tube plate-fin heat exchangers, then manufacturing cost and complexity are reduced, but thermal energy performance is insufficient requiring large fin surface areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidthermal energy performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding vortex generators only at specific locations (upstream of tube rows) rather than modifying the entire fin structure. This localized enhancement improves thermal performance at the heat transfer bottleneck while keeping manufacturing simple and costs low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The vortex generators change the flow parameters (creating vortices and mixing) to enhance heat transfer coefficients. This parameter change allows achieving better thermal performance without increasing fin surface area or complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If large fin surface areas are used to meet performance requirements, then thermal energy performance is improved, but heat exchanger size, weight, and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal energy performanceVSAvoidheat exchanger weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The vortex generators modify flow parameters to enhance heat transfer coefficients, allowing the system to achieve the same thermal performance with a smaller heat exchanger size and less material, thereby reducing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The vortex generators create asymmetric flow patterns with controlled vortices that enhance mixing and heat transfer. This asymmetric flow manipulation improves thermal performance without requiring proportional increases in heat exchanger size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Productivity

If surface interruption enhancements like lances and louver geometries are used, then thermal performance is improved, but effectiveness is lost under frosting conditions due to blockage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal performanceVSAvoidperformance under frosting conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vortex generators are positioned locally upstream of tube rows where flow separation occurs, creating vortices that enhance heat transfer without blocking the fin surfaces. This local enhancement maintains effectiveness under frosting conditions unlike surface interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of interrupting the fin surface (which gets blocked by frost), the patent uses protruding vortex generators upstream of tubes to create beneficial flow patterns. This inverted approach enhances heat transfer without creating blockage points on the fin surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Productivity

If vortex generators are positioned at nonzero angle of attack, then convective heat transfer is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvective heat transferVSAvoidvortex generator configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vortex generators are positioned at specific angles of attack to optimize vortex strength and heat transfer enhancement. This parameter optimization achieves maximum thermal performance with a relatively simple geometric configuration that remains manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The configuration improves thermal energy performance, reduces the overall size of the heat exchanger, and maintains efficiency even under frosting conditions without significant pressure drop penalties, while being cost-effectively manufactured.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of vortex generators extending from a fin surface of the plurality of fins. The plurality of vortex generators are arranged to define nozzle like passages at the heat exchange tubes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

enhance convective heat transfer and frost distribution while maintaining low pressure drop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

a plurality of heat exchange tubes configured for flowing a refrigerant therethrough

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

enhance convective heat transfer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 5

a plurality of fins positioned such that the plurality of heat exchange tubes pass through a plurality of tube openings in the plurality of fins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS11519679B2Vortex-enhanced heat exchanger
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 CARRIER CORP
  • US11519679B2 patent drawing
  • US11519679B2 patent drawing
  • US11519679B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tube and fin heat exchanger includes a plurality of heat exchange tubes configured for flowing a refrigerant therethrough, a plurality of fins positioned such that the plurality of heat exchange tubes pass through a plurality of tube openings in the plurality of fins, and a plurality of vortex generators extending from a fin surface of the plurality of fins. The plurality of vortex generators are arranged to define nozzle like passages at the heat exchange tubes.