Grid-Free Turbulence Simulation Using Vortex Filaments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation systems face inefficiencies and inaccuracies in modeling high Reynolds number turbulence, particularly in complex geometries and scenarios involving moving boundaries, synthetic jets, and exascale computing, due to limitations in vortex methods and grid-based simulations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a CFD simulation system that utilizes vortex sheets and tubes, combined with the Fast Multipole Method (FMM) and exascale computing, to efficiently model fluid flow and turbulence, reducing computational complexity and improving accuracy by using a grid-free approach and adaptive meshing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If grid-based simulations (RANS/LES) are used to model fluid flow, then the fluid flow domain can be covered with a mesh, but the simulation efficiency and accuracy deteriorate due to failure to address real physics in high Reynolds number turbulence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of turbulence modelingVSAvoidsimulation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional grid-based mechanical mesh system with a vortex-based computational approach. Instead of using fixed or moving grids to discretize the flow domain, the invention uses vortex elements (vortex particles, vortex rings, vortex filaments) to represent and track turbulent structures directly, eliminating the need for mesh generation and associated computational overhead while capturing true turbulent physics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter representation from grid coordinates and velocity fields to vortex strength, position, and circulation parameters. This parameter transformation allows direct modeling of high Reynolds number turbulence without the diffusive effects inherent in grid-based methods, improving both accuracy and computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If vortex methods are used to track individual vortical structures, then high Reynolds number turbulence effects can be represented with high numerical accuracy, but the number of vortices grows to unmanageable levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumerical accuracy of turbulence representationVSAvoidnumber of vortex elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes vortex elements that have become negligible or redundant in the flow field. By continuously identifying and eliminating vortices with minimal impact on the overall flow dynamics, the system maintains numerical accuracy while preventing uncontrolled growth in the number of tracked vortex elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements a vortex lifecycle management system where vortices are discarded when they merge, dissipate, or become insignificant, and new vortices are generated only when physically necessary. This dynamic creation and destruction process maintains computational tractability while preserving essential turbulent structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If Biot-Savart law evaluation is used to compute velocities from vortex elements, then the vortex method formulation can be maintained, but the computational time increases beyond reasonable levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefidelity of vortex method formulationVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computational domain and vortex elements into groups or clusters, allowing the Biot-Savart law to be applied efficiently to subsets of vortices. This segmentation enables parallel computation and reduces the computational burden of evaluating velocity fields from all vortex elements at each time step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces intermediary data structures and computational representations that mediate between the vortex elements and the Biot-Savart law evaluation. These intermediaries pre-compute or approximate velocity contributions, reducing the computational complexity from O(Nv²) to a more manageable level while maintaining formulation fidelity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If random walk diffusion model is used for traditional random vortices, then the vortex dynamics can be simulated, but noise is introduced that exceeds levels found in real turbulent flows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of vortex simulationVSAvoidaccuracy of turbulence representation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the diffusion parameterization from random walk models to physically-based diffusion coefficients that match real turbulent flow characteristics. By using diffusion parameters derived from actual turbulence statistics rather than stochastic random walk assumptions, the invention eliminates excessive numerical noise while maintaining computational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11809794B2System and method for simulating turbulence
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 VORCAT
  • US11809794B2 patent drawing
  • US11809794B2 patent drawing
  • US11809794B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for simulation of fluid flow. The system being configured to remove loops in a vortex filament in a simulation model and reconnect the filament. The system may also be configured to model fluid flow in relation to a moving object and to correct errors in surface vorticity.