Compressed Gas Vortex Insert for Low Pressure Loss Filtration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for contaminant reduction in compressed air, such as sintered filters and radially arranged baffles, suffer from high pressure loss, inefficiency in condensate removal, and require frequent maintenance due to blockages, leading to energy inefficiency and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus with a tubular insert featuring a baffle and curved walls that creates a vortex, allowing for efficient removal of water condensate and particles with minimal pressure loss, using injection-molded thermoplastic materials for low-cost production and easy maintenance, and optionally incorporating a filter element for additional filtration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sintered filters are used for contaminant removal, then particle removal is achieved, but pressure loss increases due to low internal voids volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle removal efficiencyVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus segments the contaminant removal process into two distinct stages: a pre-separation stage using a cyclonic vortex to remove condensate and large particles, and a final filtration stage using a sintered filter. This segmentation allows the sintered filter to operate with reduced load, maintaining particle removal efficiency while minimizing pressure loss by handling only fine particles rather than all contaminants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cyclonic pre-separator performs preliminary action by removing the bulk of condensate and large particles before the air stream reaches the sintered filter. This preliminary removal reduces the contaminant load on the filter, allowing it to maintain high particle removal efficiency with lower pressure drop across the filter element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If sintered filters are used for contaminant removal, then particle removal is achieved, but maintenance frequency increases due to void blockage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle removal efficiencyVSAvoidmaintenance frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the filtration function into pre-separation and final filtration stages, the sintered filter is protected from rapid void blockage. The pre-separator handles the bulk contaminants that would otherwise quickly clog the filter, significantly extending maintenance intervals while maintaining consistent particle removal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pre-separator performs preliminary action by removing condensate and large particles that would cause rapid filter blockage. This extends the service life of the sintered filter between maintenance events, reducing maintenance frequency while preserving particle removal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If radially arranged baffles are used to impart spinning motion, then condensate removal is attempted, but flow distribution becomes uneven across blades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensate removal capabilityVSAvoidflow distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus uses a conical cyclonic vortex chamber with curved surfaces instead of flat radially arranged baffles. The curved geometry naturally guides the air stream in a smooth rotational path, ensuring even flow distribution throughout the vortex. This eliminates the flow unevenness problem of radial baffles while maintaining effective condensate removal through centrifugal force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Reliability

If multiple filtration stages are added to improve contaminant removal, then particle removal rating increases, but pressure loss increases particularly at filtration stage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle removal ratingVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus segments contaminant removal into distinct stages with different mechanisms: cyclonic pre-separation for condensate and large particles, followed by sintered filter for fine particles. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized for its specific function, achieving high overall particle removal rating while minimizing total pressure loss by avoiding redundant filtration of already-removed contaminants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cyclonic pre-separator uses pneumatic principles to generate a rotating air stream that separates condensate and large particles through centrifugal force and impaction, without requiring mechanical filtration. This pneumatic pre-separation reduces the burden on the sintered filter, allowing it to achieve high particle removal ratings with minimal pressure drop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus effectively removes condensate and particles in a single step with minimal pressure loss, reducing maintenance needs and production costs, while ensuring even air flow distribution for optimal contaminant removal.

Implementation Method 1

at least one curved wall extending from said baffle for causing said stream of compressed gas to rotate around an axis of said tubular portion and thereby form a vortex

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

a tubular portion connected to the head portion such that the gas from the inlet pathway engages said insert externally of said tubular portion and the gas passes to the outlet pathway from internally of said tubular portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow direction control:

Data Source

PatentEP3126031B1Apparatus for contaminant reduction in a stream of compressed gas
Publication Date: 2020.04.29 NORGREN LTD
  • EP3126031B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3126031B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3126031B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An apparatus for contaminant reduction in a stream of compressed gas is disclosed. The apparatus includes an insert for directing the gas. The insert sits in a head portion which has an inlet leading to an inlet pathway for directing the gas towards the insert. The head portion also has an outlet leading from an outlet pathway for directing the gas from the insert towards the outlet. There is also a body portion sealed to the head portion for collecting contaminants removed from the gas. The insert includes a tubular portion connected to the head portion. Gas from the inlet pathway passes outside the tubular portion whilst gas going to the outlet passes inside the tubular portion. The insert has a baffle extending from the tubular portion for narrowing the gap between the insert and the body portion and has curved walls extending from the baffle causing the stream of gas to rotate thereby form a vortex.