Vortex Propeller Helical Blades Wind Energy Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wind turbine propeller designs are inefficient in capturing wind power due to aerodynamic and structural compromises, leading to suboptimal power extraction and increased costs, with traditional designs capturing only 40-50% of available wind power, limited by blade thickness, angle of attack, and tip speed ratio.

Innovation Solution

A vertically oriented propeller with a central shaft and blades configured in a helical or spiral orientation, approximating a vortex shape, which optimizes the angle of attack and lift distribution, allowing for increased wind energy capture by focusing energy flow towards the rotor center and minimizing drag.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional propeller blade designs are used, then structural cost is reduced, but power extraction efficiency is limited to 40-50% of available wind power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower extraction efficiencyVSAvoidstructural cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The propeller is divided into multiple blades (typically 3-7 blades) radiating from a central shaft, with each blade independently optimized for aerodynamic performance. This segmentation allows the system to capture wind energy more efficiently across different angular positions while maintaining structural feasibility through modular construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blades are designed with curved, aerodynamic cross-sections that follow vortex flow patterns. The curved blade geometry optimizes lift generation and reduces drag by aligning with the natural vortex flow of wind around the rotating propeller, enabling extraction of more than the traditional 40-50% of available wind power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Strength

If blade thickness is increased for structural strength, then blade strength is improved, but aerodynamic efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade strengthVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade design implements varying thickness distribution along the blade span, with thicker sections near the root for structural strength and thinner sections toward the tip for aerodynamic efficiency. This local quality variation allows each section of the blade to be optimized for its specific functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The propeller blades utilize composite material construction, combining materials with different properties to achieve both strength and aerodynamic efficiency. The composite structure allows for optimized thickness and density distribution throughout the blade, providing necessary structural integrity while maintaining thin, aerodynamically efficient profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If the number of blades is increased, then power capture area is increased, but drag and structural complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower capture areaVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The propeller design uses a moderate number of blades (3-7) rather than maximizing blade count, recognizing that beyond a certain point, additional blades increase drag and complexity without proportionally increasing power capture. This partial action approach optimizes the balance between power capture area and structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The vortex-shaped propeller design enhances wind energy capture by increasing the efficiency of lift force generation and reducing drag, potentially exceeding the theoretical maximum of 59% power extraction, while minimizing structural costs and dynamic stalling.

Implementation Method 1

A vortex propeller comprises a plurality of blades disposed together to approximate the shape of a vortex. The pitch and twist of the blades are configured to optimize the angle of attack and the lift of each blade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLift force generation: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The pitch and twist of the blades are configured to optimize the angle of attack and the lift of each blade as well as the total swept disc area. The vortex-shaped propeller design enhances wind energy capture by increasing the efficiency of lift force generation and reducing drag

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag reduction: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10260479B2Vortex propeller
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 MORIARTY DONALD E
  • US10260479B2 patent drawing
  • US10260479B2 patent drawing
  • US10260479B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A central shaft is oriented in a position that is normal to the surface of the ground and normal to a direction of fluid flow. The central shaft has a plurality of blades emanating from the central shaft, wherein each one of the plurality of blades has an outside edge and an inside edge, the inside edge being attached directly to an outside surface of the central shaft. The outside edge of the blade extends upward curving around the central shaft and the inside edge of the blade extends upward curving around the central shaft. The turn rate of the inside edge of the blades about the central shaft is less than the turn rate of the outside edge of the blades about the central shaft.