Vortex Reactor Plasma Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fluidized bed reactors and plasma generators face inefficiencies due to the use of grids, limited electrode lifetime, and poor mixing of solid particulates, leading to reduced efficiency and shorter operational lifetimes in applications such as combustion, gasification, and plasma processing.

Innovation Solution

A vortex reactor design with a frustum-shaped reaction chamber, incorporating both axial and circumferential gas flows, and a method for plasma-assisted processing using a gliding electrical arc between electrodes, which enhances mixing and interaction of solid particles with gas and plasma, eliminating the need for a grid and improving energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a grid is used in fluidized bed reactors, then plasma generation is enabled, but electrode lifetime is reduced and energy efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode lifetimeVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the grid component from the fluidized bed reactor system. By extracting the grid, the invention eliminates the harmful interaction between solid particles and the grid structure that causes erosion and limits electrode lifetime, while also removing the energy losses associated with grid-based plasma generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a circumferential gas flow as an intermediary mechanism to achieve plasma generation without a physical grid. The gas flow acts as a mediator that enables plasma formation through a different mechanism (electrodeless plasma or gliding arc) that does not require direct contact between solid particles and electrode structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If solid particles are processed in conventional fluidized beds, then chemical reactions occur, but mixing of solid particulates is poor leading to reduced efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical reaction yieldVSAvoidmixing of solid particulates
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a circumferential dimension to the gas flow pattern, creating a three-dimensional flow structure with both axial and circumferential components. This dimensional enhancement transforms the conventional single-direction fluidization into a multi-directional flow that dramatically improves solid particle mixing and distribution throughout the reactor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a dynamic flow pattern where gas moves both axially and circumferentially, generating turbulent mixing and enhanced particle interaction. This dynamic multi-directional flow regime replaces the static or simple upward flow of conventional fluidized beds, significantly improving mixing efficiency and chemical reaction yields.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If conventional fluidized bed design is used, then solid handling is simplified, but uniform particle distribution is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform particle distributionVSAvoidreactor design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves uniform particle distribution by introducing circumferential gas flow that acts in a direction perpendicular to the conventional axial flow. This additional dimensional component creates more uniform particle suspension and distribution throughout the reactor cross-section, eliminating the non-uniformity of conventional designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The vortex reactor design improves the efficiency and lifetime of fluidized bed processes by ensuring uniform particle distribution, increasing chemical reaction yields, and extending electrode life, while reducing energy consumption and NOx formation.

Implementation Method 1

a circumferential gas flow is created in said reaction chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

an axial gas flow is created in said reaction chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 3

generating plasma in at least a portion of the reaction mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical arc: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 4

plasma-assisted processing of solid particulates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Data Source

PatentUS8110155B2Vortex reactor and method of using it
Publication Date: 2012.02.07 DREXEL UNIV
  • US8110155B2 patent drawing
  • US8110155B2 patent drawing
  • US8110155B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vortex reactor is provided. The vortex reactor includes a reaction chamber formed by a frustum-shaped portion, the narrower part of which is downwardly oriented. Proximate to the narrower part of the frustum-shaped portion, the vortex reactor includes apparatus for creating an axial gas flow and apparatus for creating a circumferential gas flow. The vortex reactor also includes a particulate solid inlet for feeding particulate solids to the reaction chamber. The vortex reactor may optionally include apparatus for generating plasma in the reaction chamber by providing a gliding arc electrical discharge in the reaction chamber. Also provided is a method of processing particulate solids using the vortex reactor of the invention. A reverse vortex plasma reactor (TSAPG) is also provided.