Vortex Tube Cooling for Encapsulated Turbine Blade Workpieces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fixturing complex workpieces, such as turbine blades, is challenging due to their geometry, and existing encapsulation methods are inefficient in cooling and handling, particularly when high thermal stability and rapid cooling are required.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a vortex tube to cool encapsulated workpieces by adjusting air temperature and flow rate in multiple stages, with enclosures to enhance heat transfer and reduce cooling time, allowing for precise temperature control and efficient heat removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If traditional cooling methods are used for encapsulated workpieces, then the cooling process is simple, but the cooling time is excessive and thermal stability cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidcooling time
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling process is divided into multiple stages with different air temperatures and flow rates. The first stage uses higher temperature and flow rate to remove bulk heat quickly, while the second stage uses lower temperature and flow rate for precise temperature control, thereby reducing total cooling time while maintaining thermal stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling system dynamically adjusts air temperature and flow rate based on the encapsulation's temperature. The vortex tube allows continuous adjustment of the cooling parameters to match the changing thermal state of the workpiece, optimizing cooling efficiency at each stage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If high flow rate cooling air is used, then cooling rate increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling process uses periodic adjustment of flow rates with two distinct stages. The first stage operates at high flow rate for rapid cooling when temperature difference is large, then transitions to a second stage with reduced flow rate for fine-tuning, thereby achieving high productivity while reducing overall energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of cooling air (temperature and flow rate) during the cooling process. By adjusting these parameters in two stages, the system achieves rapid initial cooling followed by energy-efficient temperature maintenance, optimizing both productivity and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If encapsulation is cooled rapidly, then production rate increases, but dimensional precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoiddimensional precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling process is segmented into two stages: rapid cooling stage for quick temperature reduction, and precision cooling stage for dimensional stabilization. This segmentation allows the system to achieve both high production rate and dimensional precision by addressing different requirements at different cooling phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors the temperature of the encapsulation and adjusts the cooling air parameters accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures that rapid cooling does not compromise dimensional precision by automatically reducing cooling intensity when the target temperature is approached

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively cools encapsulations from 300°C to 50°C or below 25°C, enabling precise dimensional analysis and safe handling, while maintaining a high production rate by sustaining a cooling rate of at least 20 kJ/min for 15 seconds with a single vortex tube.

Implementation Method 1

feeding pressurized air into a tangential inlet of said vortex tube in a manner to generate an external vortex flow propagating lengthwise along the vortex tube toward an annular hot air outlet, and an inner vortex flow propagating back from the hot air outlet, within the external vortex flow, to a cool air outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

transferring heat from the inner vortex flow to the external vortex flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Convection

Implementation Method 3

cooling the encapsulation using cooling air at a first air temperature and a first flow rate from a vortex tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS11529678B2System and method for encapsulating a workpiece
Publication Date: 2022.12.20 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US11529678B2 patent drawing
  • US11529678B2 patent drawing
  • US11529678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The method can include: using a mold, casting an encapsulation onto a workpiece including solidifying the encapsulation around the workpiece in the mold and extracting the encapsulation from the mold, and cooling the extracted encapsulation using a vortex tube.