Voting Circuit Limitation for Independent Safety Protection Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing safety function actuation logic in nuclear power plants does not ensure independency between duplex safety protection devices, as it can disable the emergency stop function based on coolant pressure when receiving abnormality signals from another device, even if the local device does not detect abnormalities, leading to potential safety function limitations.

Innovation Solution

A safety protection device with first determination circuits that output actuation demand signals when detecting abnormality and a voting circuit that determines a majority of actuation demand signals, combined with a limitation circuit to prevent dependence on external device signals, ensuring the safety function is only limited when abnormalities are detected locally.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the safety function actuation logic receives abnormality signals from another device in a duplex configuration, then the safety function can be actuated based on majority voting, but the independency between duplex devices is compromised and the safety function may be disabled unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety function actuation reliabilityVSAvoidindependency between duplex devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the determination logic into two separate segments: a first determination circuit that evaluates only local detector signals, and a voting circuit that combines both local and external determination results. This segmentation ensures that the local device maintains independent decision-making capability while still participating in the overall safety function actuation through the voting mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary limitation circuit that mediates between the voting circuit output and the safety function actuation. This limitation circuit acts as a gatekeeper that prevents the safety function from being disabled solely based on external device signals, thereby preserving device independency while allowing cooperative safety actuation when both local and external conditions are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the safety function is limited to depend only on local detector signals, then device independency is maintained, but the ability to achieve high reliability through multiplexed detectors is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice independencyVSAvoidsafety function actuation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the independent local determination result with the external determination results in the voting circuit. The voting circuit combines multiple determination sources (local first determination circuit and external second determination circuits) to achieve a majority vote, thereby enhancing reliability while preserving local device independence through the limitation circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the voting circuit considers only local determination results, then device independence is ensured, but the safety function cannot be actuated when external detectors indicate abnormality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice independenceVSAvoidsafety function actuation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the voting circuit receives determination results from both local and external devices and feeds back the combined evaluation to control the safety function actuation. The limitation circuit provides additional feedback to ensure that external signals alone cannot disable the safety function, maintaining a balance between independence and cooperative reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240379252A1Safety protection device
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US20240379252A1 patent drawing
  • US20240379252A1 patent drawing
  • US20240379252A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This safety protection device includes: a limitation circuit for performing limitation so that a determination result of a voting circuit does not depend on only outputs of the second determination circuits from outside of the safety protection device, is provided to the voting circuit or at a preceding stage or a subsequent stage of the voting circuit. The voting circuit is imparted with a function of executing a limiting function only when abnormality of a process parameter is detected by a signal from a detector connected to the own device, thereby preventing the function of the own device from being limited or disabled by only a signal from another device.