Voting Computer Barcode Generation for Remote Ballot Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing absentee ballot systems face challenges with timely delivery, manual marking errors, and invalid votes due to voter mistakes, as well as the inability to process remote votes using optical scanners, which can lead to disenfranchisement and inaccuracies in vote counting.

Innovation Solution

A method using a voting computer to generate a machine-readable element, such as a barcode, representing voter selections, which is recorded and sent to a central office for processing by optical scanners, ensuring compatibility with standard counting methods and including human-readable verification to ensure accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If absentee ballots are sent by postal mail to voters, then voters can receive ballots remotely, but the delivery time is insufficient and ballots arrive late for processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote ballot deliveryVSAvoidballot delivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical postal mail delivery system with an electronic data transmission system. Ballots are delivered as electronic files through communication networks, eliminating the time constraints of physical mail delivery while maintaining remote accessibility for voters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates electronic copies of ballots that can be transmitted instantly via digital communication channels. These electronic ballot copies contain all necessary voting information and can be delivered immediately to voters remotely, solving the timing issue without requiring physical mail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If absentee ballots are manually copied to optical scanner compatible formats, then ballots can be processed by optical scanners, but human errors or malicious modifications may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical scanner compatibilityVSAvoidvote counting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual copying process with automated electronic data processing. The electronic ballot data is directly formatted and transmitted in optical scanner compatible formats without human intervention, eliminating the risk of human errors or malicious modifications while maintaining compatibility with optical scanning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If blank ballots are manually marked by voters, then voters can cast their votes, but voter mistakes lead to invalid votes without immediate feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevote castingVSAvoidvote validity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements immediate feedback mechanisms through electronic interfaces that guide voters through the ballot marking process. The system validates voter selections in real-time, providing immediate feedback when mistakes are made (such as under-voting or over-voting), allowing voters to correct errors before submission and ensuring vote validity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If folded absentee ballots are fed into optical scanners, then electronic counting can be performed, but folded sheets tend to stick in optical scanners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectronic counting efficiencyVSAvoidscanner processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates electronic copies of ballot data that are inherently flat and machine-readable. Instead of physically scanning folded paper ballots, the system uses electronic data copies that have already been captured from the voter's electronic selections, eliminating the physical handling issues of folded ballots while maintaining electronic counting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9165417B2Method and system for the protection of voting options for remote voting
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 COMITIA EU S L U
  • US9165417B2 patent drawing
  • US9165417B2 patent drawing
  • US9165417B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The method includes using a voting computer to represent the user selected voting options gathered by a voting application running in the voting computer, using an element that has a machine readable format such as a barcode, recording then the element in a physical media using a printing device connected to the voting computer, so that it is suitable to be delivered by the user using a physical channel such as a postal service to the electoral officers. Once the delivered physical media is received by the intended destination (e.g., election officials), the method introduces the step of reading the element information contained in the physical media using a reading device connected to a retrieving computer. Finally, the method introduces a process for generating a physical ballot in the retrieving computer using the information delivered by the voter and a printing device.