Automated Voting Information Consolidation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for distributing and consolidating issuer information to beneficial owners of securities held by multiple custodians are inefficient, as they often require manual data entry and lack automated validation and confirmation processes, leading to potential errors and delays in voting instructions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that consolidates vote request information from multiple custodians, integrates it into a voting entity's database, and generates voting instructions based on beneficiary owner inputs, utilizing automated data transfer and validation protocols to ensure accurate and timely processing of voting information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual data entry is used to consolidate vote request information from multiple custodians, then system complexity is reduced, but processing time increases and error rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual data entry operations with automated electronic data transfer and processing systems. Vote request information is electronically transmitted from multiple custodians to the voting entity, eliminating the need for manual consolidation while reducing processing time and errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated information consolidation system that acts as an intermediary between multiple custodians and the voting entity. This intermediary automatically receives, validates, and consolidates vote request information from multiple custodians, reducing both system complexity and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated data transfer and validation protocols are implemented, then processing speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual validation processes with automated validation protocols that electronically verify vote request information from multiple custodians. This automation increases processing speed while the modular design keeps system complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated validation protocols perform self-validation of incoming data, automatically checking for errors and inconsistencies without requiring complex manual verification processes. This increases processing speed while maintaining reasonable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If manual processes are used for integrating issuer information, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability decreases due to potential errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidaccuracy of voting instructions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual integration processes with automated electronic integration of issuer information from multiple custodians. This automation maintains ease of operation through standardized interfaces while significantly improving reliability by eliminating manual errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated validation and confirmation processes provide immediate feedback on the accuracy and completeness of integrated issuer information, allowing for real-time error detection and correction, thereby improving reliability while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If automated validation and confirmation processes are implemented, then reliability increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of voting instructionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual validation procedures with automated electronic validation protocols that systematically verify vote request information. This automation increases reliability while the modular architecture keeps overall system complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated validation processes perform self-checks on incoming data, automatically identifying and flagging errors without requiring complex external verification systems, thereby improving reliability while maintaining reasonable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8788318B1Methods and systems for consolidating, distributing and integrating issuer information for a voting entity
Publication Date: 2014.07.22 BROADRIDGE INVESTOR COMM SOLUTIONS
  • US8788318B1 patent drawing
  • US8788318B1 patent drawing
  • US8788318B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present invention relate to methods and systems for consolidating, distributing and integrating issuer information for a voting entity. More particularly, in one embodiment of the present invention a computer implemented voting method is provided, comprising: consolidating vote request information relating to a security owned by a beneficial owner and held by at least two custodians for the beneficial owner; generating at least a first computer file including the consolidated vote request information; electronically transmitting the first computer file to a computer system of a voting entity; integrating the first computer file into a database associated with the computer system of the voting entity; receiving, at the computer system of the voting entity, at least one beneficial owner vote instruction sent from the beneficial owner; and generating at least one voting entity vote instruction responsive to the consolidated vote request information, wherein the voting entity vote instruction is generated by the computer system of the voting entity based at least in part upon the integrated first computer file and the beneficial owner vote instruction from the beneficial owner.