Voting Device External Appearance Change for Election Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic voting systems lack voter control over the calculated results, are prone to manipulation, and can be overwhelming for older or visually impaired voters due to complex interfaces.

Innovation Solution

Voting devices that change their external appearance visibly after vote registration, allowing voters to approximate the election result and featuring a transmitter/receiver unit, button, battery, lighting device, and processing unit for secure and visible vote transmission and counting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If electronic voting systems with many buttons and displays are used, then vote counting speed and accuracy are improved, but ease of operation deteriorates for older or visually impaired voters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevote counting speedVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The voting system is divided into two independent parts: a simple voting interface with few buttons for voters, and a separate display system that shows the voting result. This segmentation allows the voting device to remain simple while still providing fast electronic counting and visible result verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A central control unit acts as an intermediary between the simple voting devices and the display system. The control unit receives votes from multiple simple voting devices, processes them electronically, and sends the result to the display, thereby enabling fast electronic counting without complicating the voter interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If electronic voting systems with many buttons are used, then adaptability increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the voting function (simple button press) from the display function (complex result presentation). Each voting device contains only minimal components needed for voting, while the central control unit handles the complexity of result processing and display coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The simple voting device with few buttons can be used for various voting scenarios (different numbers of alternatives, different voting types) by changing the configuration in the central control unit, making the simple device universally applicable without adding complexity to each individual voting device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If traditional show of hands voting is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but productivity and measurement precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidvote counting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual counting process is replaced by an electronic system that automatically records and processes votes. Voters still perform the simple action of pressing a button (similar to raising a hand), but the counting is done electronically by the central control unit, providing both speed and simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If electronic voting systems without visible feedback are used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to verify results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides visual feedback by displaying the voting result in a visible location after votes are cast. This feedback loop allows voters to verify that their votes were recorded correctly and to check the overall result, thereby ensuring reliability without adding complexity to the voting devices themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables voters to verify the election result, prevents manipulation, and simplifies the counting process while maintaining emotional participation and acceptance, with secure and user-friendly operation.

Implementation Method 1

a lighting device (6) which changes the external appearance of the voting device (2) in a way that is visible to other voters from afar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentEP1801758B1Method for electronically counting votes enabling a check by the voters
Publication Date: 2015.04.08 IN MEDIAS RES FUR KOMMUNIKATIONSTECHN MBH
  • EP1801758B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention relates to voting devices and a method for electronically counting elections using voting devices that can change their external appearance after recording the vote in a highly visible way, thus enabling voters to roughly check the election result.