Medical Image Voxel Labeling With Spatial Regularization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dictionary matching in medical imaging leads to frequent local mislabeling due to noise, resulting in high noise floors and reduced image quality in parameter maps, despite postprocessing techniques that compromise resolution and sharpness.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a discrete optimization algorithm with a cost function that incorporates spatial regularization through a second partial cost function, optimizing label selection for voxels or pixels based on reference information and material parameters, employing discrete Markov random field optimization algorithms to suppress high-frequency noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If dictionary matching is performed for each voxel or pixel separately, then the labeling process is computationally efficient, but high-frequency noise and local mislabeling occur frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling processing speedVSAvoidlabeling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines individual voxel labeling with spatial context by integrating a second partial cost function that considers neighboring voxels. This merging of local and spatial information reduces high-frequency noise and local mislabeling while maintaining computational efficiency through the optimized cost function formulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the labeling results of neighboring voxels to influence the labeling of the current voxel through the second partial cost function. This spatial regularization feedback mechanism suppresses noise and improves labeling reliability without significantly increasing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If postprocessing filtering is applied to reduce noise, then the noise floor decreases, but image resolution and sharpness are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise floor levelVSAvoidimage resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies spatial regularization as a preliminary action during the labeling process itself, rather than as a postprocessing step. By incorporating the second partial cost function that considers spatial relationships, the method prevents noise formation at the source, thereby maintaining image resolution and sharpness while reducing the noise floor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If spatial regularization is incorporated into the cost function, then high-frequency noise is suppressed and image quality improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidoptimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages computational complexity by optimizing the parameters of the cost function, including the weighting between the first and second partial cost functions. By carefully selecting these parameters and using efficient optimization algorithms, the method achieves spatial regularization with acceptable computational complexity while maintaining improved image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12505918B2Processing measurement information to select labels for voxels or pixels of a medical image dataset
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US12505918B2 patent drawing
  • US12505918B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for processing measurement information to select a respective label for multiple voxels or pixels of a medical image dataset. Reference information is described comprising a respective reference dataset for each one of the possible labels, and each label is associated with a material parameter. A respective label for the respective voxel or pixel is selected by using a discrete optimization algorithm to optimize a cost function comprising a first partial cost function and a second partial cost function, and the incorporation of the second partial cost function into the cost function introduces a coupling between the labels at different voxels or pixels.