Volumetric Medical Image Organ Identification via Voxel Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical imaging techniques for identifying organs in volumetric images are computationally intensive and require significant resources, often necessitating additional hardware, which is not practical in all settings, and previous methods for reducing computational burden, such as fine granular segmentation, add complexity to database design and communication protocols.

Innovation Solution

A framework that samples voxels from volumetric medical images, skipping at least one voxel between sampled voxels, and uses a trained classifier to identify the type of organ, reducing data processing while maintaining reliable identification through neighborhood information consideration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full segmentation of all organs is performed, then organ identification accuracy is improved, but computational time and resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorgan identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the volumetric medical image into smaller processing units (voxels) and further into neighborhoods. Instead of processing the entire volume at once, the method segments the data into manageable chunks that can be processed independently and efficiently, reducing overall computational time while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by sampling only a subset of voxels (e.g., one out of every k voxels) rather than processing all voxels. This selective sampling approach reduces computational burden significantly while still providing sufficient information for accurate organ identification through the trained classifier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Loss of time

If fine granular organ segmentation is used, then computational time is reduced, but additional hardware requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational timeVSAvoidhardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by creating a simplified representation of the medical image data through voxel sampling. Instead of requiring powerful hardware to process the full-resolution volumetric data, the method creates a downsampled version (copy) with fewer voxels that retains essential information for organ identification, enabling processing on standard hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the resolution and density of the processed data. By changing the sampling rate (skipping k-1 voxels out of every k), the method transforms the data parameters to reduce computational requirements while maintaining the essential characteristics needed for accurate organ identification through the classifier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If voxel sampling with skipping is applied, then data processing load is reduced, but identification accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing efficiencyVSAvoidorgan identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies merging by combining information from multiple sampled voxels into neighborhood representations. Instead of losing information through sampling, the method merges the characteristics of neighboring voxels to create comprehensive feature representations that maintain identification accuracy despite processing fewer individual voxels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through the trained classifier that learns from sampled voxel patterns and adjusts its decision-making process. The classifier receives feedback from the sampled data and refines its organ identification based on the statistical patterns and relationships learned from the voxel neighborhoods, maintaining accuracy even with reduced input data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240005493A1Method for identifying a type of organ in a volumetric medical image
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US20240005493A1 patent drawing
  • US20240005493A1 patent drawing
  • US20240005493A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A framework for identifying a type of organ in a volumetric medical image. The framework may include receiving a volumetric medical image, the volumetric medical image comprising at least one organ or portion thereof, and further receiving a single point of interest within the volumetric medical image. Voxels are sampled from the volumetric medical image, wherein at least one voxel is skipped between two sampled voxels. The type of organ is identified at the single point of interest by applying a trained classifier to the sampled voxels.