Voxel Model Transformations for 3D Print Shrinkage Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing techniques face challenges in accurately generating three-dimensional objects due to dimensional deviations caused by growth or shrinkage during the manufacturing process, particularly when using thermal fusing methods, where build materials may adhere or change volume unpredictably.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to modify object model data by applying geometrical transformations, such as scaling and offset parameters, to compensate for anticipated deformations, distinguishing between voxelized data from 2D slices and 3D meshes, and tailoring these transformations based on object generation parameters and characteristics like location, volume, and surface area within the fabrication chamber.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If thermal fusing methods are used to solidify build material, then manufacturing capability is improved, but dimensional accuracy deteriorates due to growth or shrinkage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing capabilityVSAvoiddimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies geometrical transformations to the object model data before the additive manufacturing process to pre-compensate for anticipated dimensional deviations. By calculating and applying offset parameters and scaling factors in advance based on the object's characteristics and build location, the system counteracts the growth or shrinkage that will occur during thermal fusing, thereby resolving the contradiction between manufacturing capability and dimensional accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If geometrical transformations are applied to compensate for deformation, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by applying offset parameters and scaling factors to the object model data. These geometric parameters are calculated based on the object's characteristics (volume, surface area) and build location within the fabrication chamber. By modifying the model parameters beforehand, the system achieves dimensional compensation without requiring complex real-time adjustments during manufacturing, thus improving precision while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If different transformations are applied based on object characteristics and location, then manufacturing precision is improved, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by determining different geometrical transformations based on the specific build location within the fabrication chamber and the object's characteristics. Instead of using a uniform transformation for all objects, the system calculates location-specific offset parameters and scaling factors, allowing each object to be compensated according to its local conditions. This approach improves precision by accounting for spatial variations while managing complexity through systematic calculation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures that generated objects are closer to their intended size by accounting for growth or shrinkage, improving accuracy and consistency in additive manufacturing outcomes.

Implementation Method 1

the solidification method may include heating the layers of build material to cause melting in selected regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

Additive manufacturing techniques may generate a three-dimensional object through the solidification of a build material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS12197187B2Geometrical transformations in additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 PERIDOT PRINT LLC
  • US12197187B2 patent drawing
  • US12197187B2 patent drawing
  • US12197187B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example, a method includes receiving, at least one processor, voxelised object model data describing at least part of an intended fabrication chamber content to be generated using additive manufacturing. The voxelised object model data may be derived from a first data set modelling a first object as 2D slices and a second data set modelling a second object as a 3D mesh. Data within the voxelised object model data which is derived from the first data set may be identified, and a geometrical transformation may be applied thereto.