Passive VPN IP Conflict Detection via Normalized Route Tables

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSPs) face IP address conflicts when managing virtual private networks (VPNs), leading to miscommunication and resource wastage, as existing solutions are not robust in preemptively identifying and resolving conflicts before they occur.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for passive determination of reserved IP conflicts on VPNs, using Bash scripts to extract configuration information, filter RFC 1918 addresses, expand and normalize network entries, and perform comparisons to identify conflicts, allowing for preemptive resolution through Network Address Translation (NAT) without direct access to customer devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing IP conflict detection methods are used, then IP address conflicts can be identified, but conflicts cannot be resolved preemptively before miscommunication occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIP conflict detection capabilityVSAvoidTime for conflict resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary extraction of configuration information and route tables from VPN devices, normalizes network entries, and identifies potential IP conflicts before actual miscommunication occurs. This proactive detection allows the MSSP to resolve conflicts preemptively, preventing data misrouting and reducing resolution time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis layer between VPN devices and the network traffic flow. This intermediary extracts configuration data, performs normalization, and identifies conflicts without requiring direct access to customer devices, enabling preemptive resolution while maintaining system independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If direct access to customer devices is implemented for conflict resolution, then IP conflicts can be resolved accurately, but system complexity and intrusiveness increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveConflict identification accuracyVSAvoidSystem access complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by extracting configuration information and route tables from VPN device interfaces without requiring direct access to customer endpoint devices. This intermediary layer performs all necessary analysis and conflict identification, maintaining high accuracy while minimizing system complexity and intrusiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the necessary configuration information and route tables from VPN devices to perform conflict analysis. By taking out only the required data elements rather than implementing direct device access, the system achieves accurate conflict identification without increasing overall system complexity or requiring intrusive customer device access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If comprehensive configuration extraction is performed, then all IP conflicts can be identified, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveConflict detection completenessVSAvoidConflict analysis speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary extraction of configuration information and route tables, then immediately normalizes network entries and performs iterative comparison. This preliminary action framework enables comprehensive conflict detection while optimizing processing efficiency by structuring the analysis in a systematic, multi-stage approach that avoids redundant computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The conflict detection process is segmented into distinct stages: extraction of configuration information, extraction of route tables, normalization of network entries, and iterative comparison. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, achieving comprehensive conflict detection while maintaining processing efficiency through structured, modular analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11349813B2Preemptive determination of reserved IP conflicts on VPNs
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11349813B2 patent drawing
  • US11349813B2 patent drawing
  • US11349813B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Passive determination of reserved internet protocol (IP) conflicts on one or more hosted virtual private networks (VPNs) extracts configuration information for a plurality of hosting VPNs to build an aggregated list of IP addresses with mask and associated VPN information. A route table is extracted from a router directing traffic to an appropriate VPN host among the plurality of hosting VPNs, and a sorted list with host/network address, subnet mask, and associated VPN information is generated. The configuration information and the route table is used to expand and normalize a set of network entries.