VPN Threat Detection via Behavioral Anonymization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing VPN services make it difficult to identify and mitigate malicious network activities, as attackers can launch attacks from VPN endpoints, masking their true source IP addresses.

Innovation Solution

A network-enabled threat mitigation system that includes a security manager coupled with internet points of presence (PoPs) to detect and mitigate VPN-enabled threats by filtering and blocking attacker computers, while preserving user privacy by not requiring source IP address identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If VPN services are used to hide user identity and obfuscate source IP addresses, then user privacy and security are improved, but the ability to detect and identify malicious actors is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser privacy protectionVSAvoidmalicious actor identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection process into multiple independent components: behavioral analysis module that monitors activity patterns, connection pattern analyzer that tracks communication sequences, and threat intelligence correlator that processes external data. Each component operates independently on anonymized data, allowing comprehensive threat detection without requiring source IP identification, thus resolving the contradiction between privacy protection and malicious actor identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary anonymization layer that processes all traffic metadata between the VPN service and detection systems. This intermediary component strips identifying information (source IPs) while preserving behavioral patterns, enabling threat detection through anonymized behavioral signatures rather than direct source identification, thereby maintaining both user privacy and detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If source IP addresses are not collected to preserve user privacy, then user anonymity is improved, but the precision of threat detection and blocking is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesource IP address privacyVSAvoidthreat detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the detection parameters from identifying-based (source IP addresses) to behavior-based (connection patterns, timing sequences, data flow characteristics). The system monitors and analyzes temporal patterns, communication frequencies, and behavioral sequences as alternative parameters, achieving precise threat detection without requiring source IP information, thus resolving the contradiction between information loss and detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the traditional mechanical identification system (relying on source IP addresses as the primary identification mechanism) with a behavioral fingerprinting system. Instead of directly identifying threats through source IPs, the system uses machine learning models to analyze and compare behavioral patterns, replacing the identification mechanism while maintaining or improving detection accuracy without compromising privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If behavioral monitoring is implemented without source IP identification, then user privacy is preserved, but the complexity of the detection system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy preservationVSAvoiddetection system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universal anonymized behavioral analysis components that serve multiple detection functions simultaneously. The same anonymization module processes all traffic types, the same behavioral pattern recognition engine analyzes different threat categories, and the same threat intelligence correlator handles various data sources. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity despite the sophisticated detection capabilities, while maintaining privacy preservation through consistent anonymized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4178159B1Privacy preserving malicious network activity detection and mitigation
Publication Date: 2025.03.05 AVAST SOFTWARE
  • EP4178159B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4178159B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4178159B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method includes accessing a first intelligence feed including a plurality of cybersecurity incidents. A second intelligence feed is generated including a plurality of technical indicators defined on one or more virtual private network internet point of presence ("VPN internet PoP") that connects a plurality of VPN tunnels to an internet. The first and second intelligence feeds are compared, a particular incident is determined, and a time frame of the particular incident is determined. Use of a particular VPN internet PoP by a plurality of sources including a plurality of clients is monitored to determine a plurality of time-based behaviors. The plurality of time-based behaviors are compared to the particular incident and to the time frame to determine a match. A particular source is blocked at the particular VPN internet PoP based on the determination of the match.