VR User Interface with Trust-Coded Avatars for Data Sharing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In virtual reality environments, users lack confidence in the identity of third parties and security of transactions, as well as effective methods to share data while maintaining privacy, due to the lack of clear trust indicators and secure data sharing mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A VR host computing system generates avatars with visual indicators based on trust data and determines shareable user data portions based on trust levels, providing secure data management and identity verification through a certificate authority system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If visual indicators are added to avatars to show trust levels, then user trust and confidence are improved, but device complexity and rendering requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser trustVSAvoidavatar rendering complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies color changes by rendering visual indicators on avatars using different colors to represent trust levels. Trusted entities are indicated with specific colors (e.g., green), while untrusted or suspicious entities use different colors (e.g., red or gray). This allows users to quickly perceive trust information through color coding without complex interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses visual indicators that copy or replicate the avatar's visual characteristics while adding trust information. The indicators are rendered as overlays or modifiers on the avatar model, preserving the original avatar appearance while adding trust-level visualization layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If trust verification processes are implemented, then security of transactions is improved, but interaction time and user experience are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidavatar encounter time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by performing trust verification before the avatar encounter begins. The system checks whether an entity is trusted using a certificate authority and stores this trust information in advance. When the avatar encounter occurs, the pre-verified trust level is immediately displayed without requiring real-time verification, thus maintaining security while minimizing interaction time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by providing immediate visual feedback to users about the trust level of encountered entities. The visual indicators on avatars give users instant information about whether the entity is trusted, allowing users to make quick decisions about interactions without delays in verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If data sharing mechanisms are provided, then ease of data exchange is improved, but privacy protection is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata exchange easeVSAvoidprivacy risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by enabling users to selectively share different portions of their data with different entities based on trust levels. The system allows users to define what data can be shared with trusted entities versus what should remain private, creating localized data sharing policies that balance convenience with privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a certificate authority as an intermediary to mediate between data owners and data requesters. The CA verifies the identity and trust level of entities before allowing data exchange, acting as a trusted mediator that enables secure data sharing while protecting user privacy from unauthorized access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250329098A1User interface for interacting with human users
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20250329098A1 patent drawing
  • US20250329098A1 patent drawing
  • US20250329098A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various examples are directed to systems and methods for serving a virtual reality user interface to a user. A computing system may receive, from a user device, an indication that a user avatar for the user is to encounter a third-party avatar associated with a third party in a virtual environment. The computing system may access trust data describing a level of trust between the user and the third party and determine a first visual indicator based at least in part on the level of trust between the user and the third party. The computing system may generate a rendering of the third-party avatar comprising the first visual indicator and serve the rendering of the third-party avatar to the user device for display by the user device to the user.