vRAN Decoding Offload for Low-Latency Edge Capacity Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

vRAN deployments face inefficiencies due to overprovisioning for peak capacity, leading to underutilization of compute resources and high energy consumption, especially at the far edge of the network, where space and power constraints are significant, and offloading decoding operations to remote locations introduces timing-related challenges like latency violations and degraded throughput.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that dynamically decides whether to decode data locally or remotely based on quality of service requirements, offloading compute-intensive tasks like Turbo decoding in 4G and LDPC decoding in 5G to higher-level edge or cloud deployments, while ensuring low-latency operations are performed at the far edge, thus optimizing resource utilization and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vRAN servers are overprovisioned for peak capacity, then service reliability is improved, but resource utilization deteriorates and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice reliabilityVSAvoidresource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation where the vRAN server can flexibly switch between local and remote decoding based on traffic conditions. During peak traffic, decoding is offloaded to remote locations; during low traffic, local decoding is used. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain reliability during peak times while improving resource utilization and reducing energy consumption during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the decoding function from the vRAN server and relocates it to remote decoding locations. This separation allows the vRAN server to focus on high-priority, low-latency tasks while non-critical decoding operations are performed remotely, improving overall system efficiency and resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Loss of time

If vRAN servers are deployed close to Radio Units at the far edge, then latency is reduced, but device size and power consumption constraints are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts power-intensive decoding operations from the edge vRAN server and relocates them to remote locations. This allows the edge server to maintain low latency by processing only critical functions locally, while reducing its power consumption by offloading non-time-critical decoding tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the decoding function into critical and non-critical components. Critical decoding that requires low latency is performed locally at the edge server, while non-critical decoding is offloaded to remote locations. This segmentation allows the system to meet latency requirements for time-sensitive traffic while reducing power consumption at the edge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If decoding operations are offloaded to remote locations, then resource utilization is improved, but latency requirements may be violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different quality levels of decoding service to different traffic types. Time-critical traffic receives high-priority local decoding with strict latency guarantees, while non-time-critical traffic receives standard remote decoding. This differentiated approach allows the system to improve overall resource utilization while maintaining latency requirements for critical applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic traffic classification and routing where the system continuously monitors traffic characteristics and dynamically decides whether to perform decoding locally or remotely based on latency requirements. This dynamic approach allows flexible resource allocation that adapts to changing traffic conditions while meeting service level agreements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4248673B1Virtualized radio access network (VRAN) decoding as a service
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP4248673B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4248673B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4248673B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The systems and methods relate to virtual radio access networks (vRANs). The systems and methods may offload a signal processing task of a physical layer from a vRAN server located at the far edge of a network nearby a base station to a remote location further away from the base station. The remote location may include higher level edge deployments of servers or a cloud deployment of servers. The system and methods may scale the vRAN server capacity by offloading the signal processing task to the remote location without compromising quality of service requirements or latency requirements of the user equipment or the applications.