VRF Edge Device Anycast Label Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In large virtual routing and forwarding (VRF) networks, the recalculation of routes and load balancing following disruptions imposes significant computational burdens on ingress provider edge devices, leading to potential data packet loss and increased resource usage.

Innovation Solution

The synchronization of a common base label, unique index value, and anycast next-hop address among egress provider edge devices allows for efficient rerouting and load balancing without requiring extensive recalculations, using these labels to encapsulate and route data packets through redundant paths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If route recalculation is performed following network disruptions in large VRF networks, then routing paths can be restored, but computational burden on ingress provider edge devices increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting path restorationVSAvoidcomputational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-establishes multiple equal-cost multi-path routes between ingress and egress provider edge devices before disruptions occur. By having backup paths pre-configured, the system eliminates the need for computationally intensive route recalculation when disruptions happen, as routers can immediately switch to pre-defined alternative paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple copies of routing information and path data across the network infrastructure. Each ingress and egress device maintains copies of routing tables and path information, enabling fast local decision-making without requiring centralized recalculation, thus reducing computational burden on any single device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If multiple routing tables are maintained for redundancy and load balancing, then network reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork redundancyVSAvoidrouting table management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal routing framework where a single routing table structure serves multiple functions: it supports both primary and backup paths, enables load balancing across multiple egress devices, and provides consistent routing behavior throughout the VRF network. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate routing tables for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple routing functions into a unified routing table structure. Instead of maintaining separate routing tables for different VRFs or different path types, the system combines them into a single integrated table that uses consistent lookup and forwarding rules, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining redundancy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If route recalculation is performed after disruptions, then network connectivity is restored, but data packet loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork connectivity restorationVSAvoiddata packet loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-configures multiple active paths and establishes them in the forwarding tables before disruptions occur. When a disruption happens, traffic can be immediately redirected along pre-established alternative paths without waiting for recalculation, thereby preventing packet loss while restoring connectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous routing functionality by maintaining multiple active paths simultaneously. Instead of having a single path that requires complete recalculation upon failure, the system keeps backup paths active and ready, ensuring continuous packet forwarding even during disruptions, thus eliminating packet loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240235995A1Virtual routing and forwarding using identical anycast identifiers on edge devices
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 ARISTA NETWORKS INC
  • US20240235995A1 patent drawing
  • US20240235995A1 patent drawing
  • US20240235995A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Virtual routing and forwarding techniques in a Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) systems using a common base label and a common index are provided herein. An advertisement is received from a device external to the VRF system, the advertisement including an address of the device. Egress edge devices of the VRF system communicate to determine the common base label and the common index to be associated with the address. A data packet is received from a network device in the VRF system. A match is determined between an overlay label of the data packet and a label value corresponding to a combination of the common base label and the common index. A set of operations are performed modifying the overlay label based on the match. The modified data packet is sent to the device external to the VRF system.