Variable refrigerant flow (VRF) dehumidification system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Standard VRF systems are unable to effectively dehumidify air to a comfortable level due to limited data points for processing and adjusting humidity levels, leading to inefficiencies and constant switching between heating and cooling modes.

Innovation Solution

A VRF dehumidification system with a plurality of sensors and electronic expansion valves, controlled by a system controller that monitors data inputs and regulates the system's capacity to maintain a set dew point parameter, allowing for precise control of humidity and temperature.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standard VRF systems operate with limited sensors and on/off cycling, then the system simplicity is maintained, but the dehumidification capability and temperature control precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehumidity control precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the building into multiple zones with independent air handlers, each equipped with its own sensors and control capabilities. This segmentation allows precise local dehumidification control while maintaining overall system manageability through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static on/off cycling to dynamic continuous modulation using inverter-driven compressors and electronic expansion valves. This enables real-time adjustment of refrigerant flow and system capacity to precisely maintain target humidity and temperature levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If HVAC systems operate at full-force or not at all, then the system operation simplicity is maintained, but the energy consumption increases and dehumidification efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehumidification efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses inverter technology to continuously vary compressor speed and refrigerant flow rate, replacing binary on/off operation. This dynamic control allows the system to operate at optimal capacity levels matching actual dehumidification needs, significantly improving efficiency and reducing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous operation at modulated capacity levels rather than cycling on and off. This continuous useful action ensures constant dehumidification capability while operating at efficient capacity levels, preventing the energy waste associated with repeated system startup and the inability to dehumidify effectively during short off-periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If the HVAC system constantly switches between heating and cooling modes, then the temperature control responsiveness is maintained, but the dehumidification capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control stabilityVSAvoiddehumidification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple functions (heating, cooling, and dehumidification) into a single unified control framework. The controller selectively activates appropriate coils and adjusts refrigerant flow to achieve the primary objective (dehumidification) while maintaining temperature stability, eliminating the need for constant mode switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (refrigerant flow rate, coil activation, expansion valve position) to achieve dehumidification while maintaining temperature control. By operating in continuous cooling mode with modulated capacity rather than switching between heating and cooling, the system enables moisture condensation while stabilizing temperature through parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If VRF systems use limited data points for processing, then the system complexity is reduced, but the humidity control precision and comfort level deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedew point control precisionVSAvoidsensor and control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system distributes multiple sensors (temperature, humidity, dew point) across different zones and system components, with each zone having independent measurement capabilities. This segmentation provides comprehensive data for precise local control while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular sensor and control arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-parameter feedback control using sensors that continuously monitor temperature, humidity, and dew point. The controller processes this feedback data and dynamically adjusts refrigerant flow and coil operation to maintain target conditions, achieving precise dew point control through continuous closed-loop regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves targeted humidity levels and maintains set temperatures with improved efficiency, reducing energy consumption and minimizing the need for constant mode switching, thereby enhancing comfort and reducing moisture-related issues in buildings.

Implementation Method 1

heat is transferred from the inside air to the refrigerant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

moisture from the air to condense and be pumped outside of the building

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

heat from the superheated and compressed gaseous refrigerant is bled off to the outside air thereby cooling the refrigerant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

When the refrigerant cools it condenses back into a liquid phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 5

The expansion valve decreases the pressure of the cooled liquid refrigerant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure regulation: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS12298031B2Variable refrigerant flow (VRF) dehumidification system
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 HUSSMANN CORP
  • US12298031B2 patent drawing
  • US12298031B2 patent drawing
  • US12298031B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) dehumidification system. The system has at least one condenser module in fluid communication with one or more indoor air handlers. At least one evaporator coil is in fluid communication with the indoor air handlers and at least one reheat/reclaim coil. The evaporator and reheat/reclaim coils are also in communication with the condenser module. A plurality of electronic expansion valves (EEVs) are in fluid communication with the indoor air handlers. A plurality of sensors is disposed in the system and are in communication with at least one VRF dehumidification system controller. In one embodiment, a logic is stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium that, when executed by one or more processors, causes the VRF dehumidification system to monitor the data input from the plurality of sensors and regulates the capacity of the VRF dehumidification system needed to maintain a set dew point parameter.