VSI Crusher Anvil Assembly Segmentation Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Anvil-type rock crushers experience significant wear and require frequent replacement, leading to high operational costs and scrap loss due to the need for replacing multiple components, including the mounting stob, neck, and side anvil, which are expensive and wasteful.

Innovation Solution

The anvil assembly features a sturdy tapered anchor plate with a wedge shape and T-shaped foot for secure anchoring, allowing anvils to be easily rotated and reused, reducing the need for additional replacement parts and minimizing scrap, with a design that incorporates docking ports instead of a rear-extending mounting stob and neck, thus reducing material waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional anvils with mounting stob and neck are used, then the anvil can be securely mounted to the anvil ring, but the mounting stob and neck must be discarded with the anvil body when the anvil is worn, resulting in high scrap loss and disposal expense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting securityVSAvoidscrap loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The anvil assembly is divided into separate components: a reusable anvil holder (mounting stob and neck) and a replaceable anvil body. The anvil holder remains on the anvil ring while only the worn anvil body is removed and replaced, allowing the holder to be reused multiple times and significantly reducing scrap loss compared to discarding the entire assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention recovers and reuses the anvil holder (mounting stob and neck) after the anvil body is worn out. Instead of discarding the entire assembly, the holder is retained and a new anvil body is mounted on it, thereby recovering valuable components and reducing material waste and disposal expenses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Productivity

If conventional anvils are replaced when worn, then the crusher can continue operating, but the replacement operation is time consuming and expensive due to discarding the entire anvil assembly including mounting stob and neck

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrusher operation continuityVSAvoidreplacement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the anvil assembly into a permanent holder and a replaceable body, the replacement process only involves swapping the worn body rather than the entire assembly. This reduces replacement time and allows the crusher to return to service more quickly, improving operational continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reusable anvil holder is recovered and retained after anvil body replacement, reducing the frequency and cost of replacements. This decreases downtime and replacement expenses while maintaining continuous crusher operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If conventional anvils with extended mounting stob and neck are manufactured, then the anvil can be mounted to the anvil ring, but the manufacturing cost is higher due to the need to incorporate additional material for the stob and neck

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into producing a reusable holder and separate replaceable bodies. The holder is manufactured once and reused, while only the smaller anvil bodies need to be manufactured and replaced, reducing overall material consumption and manufacturing costs while maintaining mounting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The anvil holder is recovered and reused across multiple anvil body replacements, amortizing its manufacturing cost over many cycles. This significantly reduces the average manufacturing cost per replacement operation compared to manufacturing complete disposable anvil assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS10441956B2Anvil assembly for VSI crusher
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 THE RODRIGUEZ & TABET FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JULY 28 2015 AS AMENDED ON NOVEMBER 19 2019
  • US10441956B2 patent drawing
  • US10441956B2 patent drawing
  • US10441956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An anvil assembly for a vertical shaft impact rock crushing machine includes a plurality of anvils and anvil holders, each anvil holder including an anchor plate and a buttress wall, the anchor plate having dual tapered shoulders and the buttress wall extending perpendicularly from one side of the anchor plate. The rear face of each anvil includes dual vertically-mirroring docking ports each having dual, inwardly-oriented, angularly inclined side channels. In a mounted configuration the shoulders of each anchor plate are detachably captured in the side channels of one of the docking ports, thereby supporting each anvil on the anvil holder and securing it to the crushing machine.