VST Response Prediction Using Generative Clinical Data Augmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of accurately predicting the efficacy of virus-specific T-cell (VST) treatments for immunocompromised patients is hindered by the lack of large datasets and complex underlying relationships between clinical variables, leading to variable treatment responses and difficulty in deciding between VST therapy and antiviral therapy.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a neural network (NN) to analyze patient variables and generate synthetic data through a generative model like a variational autoencoder (VAE) to enhance predictive models, allowing for improved decision-making on treatment choices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional predictive models are used for VST treatment efficacy, then the model complexity remains manageable, but the predictive power and accuracy are insufficient due to lack of large datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive powerVSAvoiddataset size
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies generative models to create synthetic copies of patient data that replicate the statistical properties and relationships of real clinical data. These synthetic datasets augment the limited real data, enabling training of more accurate predictive models without requiring actual additional patient records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the data from real patients into synthetic data through generative models, changing the data parameters while preserving the underlying clinical relationships. This allows the model to learn from augmented data that maintains the essential patterns needed for accurate VST efficacy prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If more clinical variables are included in the predictive model, then the predictive accuracy improves, but the complexity of underlying relationships becomes harder to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of relationships
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The generative model acts as an intermediary that processes multiple clinical variables and transforms them into synthetic data representations. This intermediary layer simplifies the complex relationships between numerous variables by capturing their joint distributions and interactions in a compressed, manageable format that the predictive model can effectively process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If synthetic data is generated to increase sample size, then the predictive power improves, but the complexity of the data generation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample sizeVSAvoiddata generation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses generative models to create synthetic copies of patient records that preserve the statistical properties and clinical relationships of real data. This copying approach increases the effective sample size while the automated generative process manages the complexity of data generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250342963A1Boosting the predictive power of virus-specific t-cell (VST) clinical trials via generative models
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 CHILDRENS NAT MEDICAL CENT
  • US20250342963A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342963A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342963A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for treating an immunocompromised patient including collecting from patient values for at least one variable selected from the group, inputting the values for the one or more variables to a neural network (NN) performed on one or more computers to produce a score indicative of likelihood of response or non-response to an anti-viral drug and a score indicative of likelihood of response or non-response to Virus-Specific T-Cells (VSTs) and administering an antiviral drug to a patient who has a threshold score indicative of a likelihood of a response to anti-viral therapy and administering VSTs to a patient who has a threshold score indicative of a likelihood of a response to VST therapy.