Virtual Tape Library Storage Manager for Backup Slippage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Backup administrators face challenges in ensuring sufficient backup storage capacity, leading to backup window slippage due to manual tracking and reactive approaches, which can result in data loss and costly consequences.

Innovation Solution

An automatic backup storage management plan that provisions virtual tape libraries (VTLs) based on utilization threshold policies, identifying slipped backup jobs, collecting storage statistics, and allocating storage by creating new VTLs, extending, or reclaiming storage to prevent slippage proactively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual backup storage tracking is used, then backup administrators can monitor storage capacity, but backup window slippage occurs due to reactive approaches and human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup completion reliabilityVSAvoidbackup window slippage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively provisioning VTL storage based on predicted backup job requirements before the backup window begins. The storage manager calculates estimated storage needs using historical data and backup policies, then allocates storage in advance, ensuring backup jobs can complete without slippage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The backup storage management system performs self-service by automatically monitoring storage capacity, identifying slipped backup jobs, allocating additional storage, and rescheduling backup jobs without human intervention. The storage manager autonomously responds to storage exhaustion conditions and backup failures, eliminating the need for manual tracking and reactive administrator actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual backup storage management is used, then administrators can respond to storage issues, but human error and reactive approaches lead to data loss risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidbackup management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated storage monitoring and management. The storage manager continuously tracks storage capacity across multiple VTLs, automatically detects when storage is approaching exhaustion thresholds, and triggers proactive provisioning or reactive reallocation without administrator intervention, eliminating human error in storage management decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring backup job status, storage capacity utilization, and backup window timing. The storage manager uses this feedback to dynamically adjust storage allocation, identify slipped jobs, and reschedule backups, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains data integrity through automated response to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If reactive backup storage allocation is used, then storage is provided after slippage detection, but the number of backup slippages increases and adverse effects are not minimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup success rateVSAvoidbackup window slippage frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary storage provisioning based on predicted backup requirements before the backup window begins. The storage manager calculates estimated storage needs using historical backup data, backup policies, and current storage capacity, then allocates storage in advance to prevent slippage before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from monitoring backup job status and storage capacity to dynamically adjust storage allocation. When storage capacity approaches exhaustion thresholds or when backup jobs are detected as slipped, the system triggers automated responses including proactive provisioning of additional VTL storage or reallocation from other VTLs, ensuring backup success while minimizing slippage frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8924667B2Backup storage management
Publication Date: 2014.12.30 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US8924667B2 patent drawing
  • US8924667B2 patent drawing
  • US8924667B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer-readable media with executable instructions stored thereon for backup storage management are provided. A utilization threshold can be defined for each of a number of virtual tape libraries (VTLs). A number of slipped backup jobs can be identified, wherein each of the number of slipped backup jobs is associated with one of the number of VTLs. A number of storage statistics for each of the number of VTLs can be collected and storage can be allocated for each of the number of slipped backup jobs via a VTL backup storage manager that analyzes the utilization threshold, the number of slipped backup jobs, and the number of storage statistics for each of the number of VTLs.