VTOL Aircraft with Distributed Propulsion and Modular Fuselage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) aircraft lack the range and speed of traditional aircraft and are often single-purpose designs with limited payload distribution, requiring a solution that enables transition between vertical hover and horizontal flight while supporting modular fuselage sections for enhanced functionality.

Innovation Solution

A distributed airframe aircraft with a modular fuselage and circular wing configuration, utilizing a distributed propulsion system with propellers along the leading edge for lift in vertical takeoff and landing, and transitioning to horizontal flight without reconfiguration, featuring variable speed constant pitch propellers and eliminating the need for gearboxes and rotor cyclic control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If tail sitter or pogo configurations are used for VTOL aircraft, then stability is improved, but range and speed are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidspeed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft employs a dynamic configuration that transitions from a vertical tail-sitter stance during hover to a horizontal airplane mode during forward flight. The distributed propulsion system dynamically adjusts thrust vectoring to maintain stability across flight regimes, while the airframe orientation changes to optimize speed during horizontal flight, resolving the contradiction between stability and speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If tail sitter or pogo configurations are used for VTOL aircraft, then stability is improved, but range is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidrange
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft transitions dynamically between vertical hover configuration and horizontal airplane mode configuration. During long-range cruise, the horizontal configuration reduces drag and improves aerodynamic efficiency, extending range while maintaining stability through the distributed propulsion system's coordinated thrust control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed propulsion system serves multiple functions: providing lift during vertical hover, enabling transition between flight modes, and providing thrust during horizontal flight. This multi-functionality allows the aircraft to achieve both stability during hover and extended range during horizontal flight without requiring separate specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If traditional VTOL configurations are used, then single purpose operation is achieved, but adaptability and versatility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle purpose operationVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft is designed as a multi-purpose platform that can operate in vertical hover mode, transition to horizontal airplane mode, and carry various payload configurations. The distributed propulsion system and modular fuselage enable the same airframe to perform multiple missions including cargo transport, passenger transport, and aerial refueling, achieving high adaptability while maintaining ease of operation through standardized control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If payload is carried only within center or suspended beneath aircraft, then structural simplicity is maintained, but adaptability and functionality are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidfunctionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fuselage is divided into modular sections that can be independently configured and attached to different parts of the airframe. This segmentation allows payloads to be distributed across multiple locations including within the fuselage, on external hardpoints, and on modular attachments, enhancing functionality while maintaining relatively simple structural connections through standardized interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Force

If distributed propulsion system with propellers along leading edge is used, then lift in vertical takeoff is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveliftVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system merges the functions of lift generation and thrust production into a single distributed array of propellers along the leading edge. During vertical takeoff, all propellers generate lift collectively, eliminating the need for separate lift and thrust systems. During horizontal flight, the same propellers provide thrust while the wings generate lift, reducing overall system complexity despite the distributed configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves long-range, high-speed flight capabilities without increased complexity or cost, providing stability and safety through symmetric matrix distribution of propellers, minimizing drag, and allowing for noise reduction and structural efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

three or more propellers proximate to a leading edge of the distributed airframe and operably connected to the one or more engines to provide lift whenever the aircraft is in vertical takeoff and landing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

transitioning to horizontal flight without reconfiguration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic thrust: Jet

Data Source

PatentEP3243747B1Vertical take off and landing closed wing aircraft
Publication Date: 2019.07.10 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC
  • EP3243747B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3243747B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3243747B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

VERTICAL TAKE OFF AND LANDING CLOSED WING AIRCRAFT An aircraft (100) capable of vertical takeoff and landing, stationary flight and forward flight includes a closed wing (102) that provides lift whenever the aircraft (100) is in forward flight, a fuselage (104) at least partially disposed within a perimeter of the closed wing (102), and one or more spokes (106) coupling the closed wing (102) to the fuselage (104). The fuselage (104) can have a rear module substantially disposed within a perimeter of the distributed airframe (1002, Figure 11), and a front module removably connected to the rear module and substantially aligned with the longitudinal axis. One or more engines or motors (132) are disposed within or attached to the closed wing (102), fuselage (104) or spokes (106). Three or more propellers (120) are proximate to a leading edge of the closed wing (102) or the one or more spokes (106), distributed along the closed wing (102) or the one or more spokes (106), and operably connected to the one or more engines or motors (132). The propellers (120) provide lift whenever the aircraft (100) is in vertical takeoff and landing and stationary flight, and provide thrust whenever the aircraft (100) is in forward flight.